From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D9AC5ACB3 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232269AbjKQVGI (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:06:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229535AbjKQVGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:06:04 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8DCD52 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:06:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700255161; x=1731791161; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=aT2WVaBK/OG0nienKZxPLkMpvLciTyV3MOhYksMFC+c=; b=gGT1TycHdV6I8z/qa3Qh3XyguBWRSpnZ2hV/uMNm7PIa+4eXCMuXnwwx EUAjBbrgX/I96IkmctuTiLR3dOyS75c2/DF4gcoIp0/lE1J9+HypjlbUO uZ5kkUDmXfJyAwjSSqs3l2K+BeSyj9Ss5QnK1I0w+e0uZge9tS/g5huHQ gajD6HOeuxd/2LtEzsMh8FOINZfFO1LYlmdJeh5nlzDy3Fz+fFRL0LyDS th1HfWjEANezw/UcTo5kvAsr87owXcx536ZhcA2/mkTeYGQqLNIX5J+iP 873wxi+1cD5JCDEvaNrJGt/xpvct6K5mAnRiifFovGurg2FZJGN6ihvCY w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10897"; a="371546988" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,206,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="371546988" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2023 13:06:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10897"; a="742187505" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,206,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="742187505" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2023 13:05:57 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1r462E-0000000Eu2D-0uzm; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:05:54 +0200 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:05:53 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jani Nikula Cc: Hans de Goede , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO Message-ID: References: <20231103201831.1037416-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871qcqqa1k.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871qcqqa1k.fsf@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which > > actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this > > series is: > > > > Tested-by: Hans de Goede > > > > And the code of the entire series also looks good to me: > > > > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede > > > > for the series. > > Thanks Andy & Hans! > > I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been > a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun. > > That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would > actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans' > testing much more. Thank you! Should I fix checkpatch warnings CI reported about? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko