From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
lech.perczak@camlingroup.com,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: sc16is7xx: improve regmap debugfs by using one regmap per port
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:22:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWCHfGmAmSpGh2e1@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124000534.aa8f0c866753c3a9e6844354@hugovil.com>
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:05:34AM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 23:37:33 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:14:47PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
...
> > This change might be problematic, i.e. ...
...
> > > regmap_update_bits(
> > > s->regmap,
> > > - SC16IS7XX_IOCONTROL_REG << SC16IS7XX_REG_SHIFT,
> > > + SC16IS7XX_IOCONTROL_REG,
> > > SC16IS7XX_IOCONTROL_MODEM_A_BIT |
> > > SC16IS7XX_IOCONTROL_MODEM_B_BIT, s->mctrl_mask);
> >
> > ...if this happens inside another regmap operation it might collide with this
> > as there is no more shared locking (and if driver is going to be converted to
> > use an external lock, the one in regmap might be disabled). But I haven't
> > checked anyhow deeply this, so just a heads up for the potential issue.
>
> Hi Andy,
> are you refering to the above piece of code as the only location where
> this could be problematic?
>
> If yes, then it is located inside sc16is7xx_setup_mctrl_ports(), which
> is called only during sc16is7xx_probe(), and I assume it should be ok.
With below it becomes two. Maybe you can point out somewhere in the code
(in a form of a comment?) that regmap[0] separate access is allowed only
in probe stage?
Also be aware, that other callbacks shouldn't be called at that time (means
no port should be made visible / registered to the users).
...
> > > - ret = regmap_read(regmap,
> > > - SC16IS7XX_LSR_REG << SC16IS7XX_REG_SHIFT, &val);
> > > + ret = regmap_read(regmaps[0], SC16IS7XX_LSR_REG, &val);
> >
> > Here is a probe, most likely no issues.
>
> Ok.
>
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return -EPROBE_DEFER;
...
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "port%d", port_id);
> >
> > Should be %u.
>
> Yes. I just noticed that Greg has applied the patch to its tty-testing
> branch, I assume I should just send a new patch to fix it?
Yes.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 21:14 [PATCH] serial: sc16is7xx: improve regmap debugfs by using one regmap per port Hugo Villeneuve
2023-11-23 21:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-24 5:05 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2023-11-24 11:22 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWCHfGmAmSpGh2e1@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hugo@hugovil.com \
--cc=hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=lech.perczak@camlingroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox