From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: kthread_should_stop() checks if we're a kthread
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWWzSZeyRuPDwBHZ@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120221503.3378095-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Adding Andrew into Cc. He usually takes changes in kernel/kthread.c.
On Mon 2023-11-20 17:15:03, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> bcachefs has a fair amount of code that may or may not be running from a
> kthread (it may instead be called by a userspace ioctl); having
> kthread_should_stop() check if we're a kthread enables a fair bit of
> cleanup and makes it safer to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> ---
> kernel/kthread.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index 1eea53050bab..fe6090ddf414 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *k)
> */
> bool kthread_should_stop(void)
> {
> - return test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &to_kthread(current)->flags);
> + return (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) &&
> + test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &to_kthread(current)->flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_should_stop);
I agree that it makes the API more safe because &to_kthread(current)
is NULL when the process is not a kthread.
Well, I do not like the idea of quietly ignoring a misuse of
the kthread_*() API. I would personally prefer to do:
// define this in include/linux/kthread.h
static inline bool in_kthread(void)
{
return current->flags & PF_KTHREAD
}
// add WARN() into kthread_should_stop()
bool kthread_should_stop(void)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_kthread))
return false;
return test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &to_kthread(current)->flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_should_stop);
And use the following in bcachefs() code:
if (in_kthread() && kthread_should_stop())
goto exit;
Is see several advantages:
+ It will warn when the API is misused.
+ It will be more clear that the bcachefs code might be
used in both kthread and userspace code.
+ in_kthread() might be used around other code which is
needed only when the process is a kthread.
+ Similar check and WARN() might be used also in the other
kthread() API.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 22:15 [PATCH] kthread: kthread_should_stop() checks if we're a kthread Kent Overstreet
2023-11-28 9:30 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2023-11-28 17:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-11-30 11:24 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWWzSZeyRuPDwBHZ@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox