From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D8BC4167B for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233178AbjK2OwE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:52:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36130 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234678AbjK2OwC (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:52:02 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D74BD6E; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:52:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701269529; x=1732805529; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=iBvOUeV8GInwE1URST0+LDM0euJ0nkLB2pW7xGvI54M=; b=DllLsTbCDGzsiRjyGLwYTZ/fsdnOC6DIkSEgvSDLNDjvDoyi2JmkZMir vJd/ltvdRjonJ07scRO1YChX/VdC8jHpT/sUzHJ/JeMazw1J0+U7eG3c3 VQB6y58UXlTIDjmh8YYHF0/mMdcqOehgIihDIYkQZp7GigZabjI2kawHW 5rfVXI2N2Sk2fGLTVvz94HZ9a1rNJBENX+9OjUm5Wzof1Fae4uD8ETuy9 VS2jHlT6eoOSi7pNhMeMQLpNABI1jmh02R7ysrxujhztUiCxOKz2xKeg4 Dszk9f8HjHfUp1Fdd3JtQ+T0MKhQikf1Tj/gPnCm1sg9ShYZ1ivcv2imJ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10909"; a="6386724" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,235,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="6386724" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2023 06:52:09 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10909"; a="942347393" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,235,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="942347393" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2023 06:48:56 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1r8Lrx-00000000Svm-1uUE; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:48:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:48:53 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux ACPI , LKML , Zhang Rui , Srinivas Pandruvada , Michal Wilczynski , Hans de Goede , Mika Westerberg , Heikki Krogerus , Mario Limonciello Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: OSL: Rearrange workqueue selection in acpi_os_execute() Message-ID: References: <3281896.aeNJFYEL58@kreacher> <2267180.iZASKD2KPV@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2267180.iZASKD2KPV@kreacher> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:48:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Replace the 3-branch if () statement used for selecting the target > workqueue in acpi_os_execute() with a switch () one that is more > suitable for this purpose and carry out the work item initialization > before it to avoid code duplication. > > No intentional functional impact. LGTM, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko