From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9809CC4167B for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234644AbjK2Ovv (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:51:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44022 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234225AbjK2Ovt (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:51:49 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BC9130; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:51:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701269514; x=1732805514; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fs4nT3+fIuEHZgrTiCBSWoggoTMx62a/i65Penk/AKg=; b=cYshQqF6HsMYWw2pa2+WIpxPIhikwVmcY42KhGtpwQ/tn8PibjUqeZYU GQJ3D3eoXNXe662U3ktEXFsztAM+bFhcyMGpMZg8WXZxbwe2/xuL4lkT1 61jIYvBIx7CvqwV8u5KveZzONviquMN+c74JJQBeUVXVgwDtPMuYXrubI 7CpV8M99J2PtpOBxwDGZvyYREi3+Ecmnz9xRajEVqpcJYleOQWjBioWYO NjiWvtvjxQwreuziv1uzGWSK8eyy8PSMNOexaVQm70FbEXYqOhmH7sD73 EDcURoopqJIxu3+Am9XtGS4DuUNAnseE7gj96PMXYSzN6D49YvYZ1Lj5k g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10909"; a="395987008" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,235,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="395987008" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2023 06:51:54 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10909"; a="839453277" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,235,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="839453277" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2023 06:51:52 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1r8Luo-00000000Sxl-06bR; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:51:50 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:51:49 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] pinctrl: baytrail: use gpiochip_dup_line_label() Message-ID: References: <20231129142411.76863-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20231129142411.76863-8-brgl@bgdev.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231129142411.76863-8-brgl@bgdev.pl> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 03:24:08PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Use the new gpiochip_dup_line_label() helper to safely retrieve the > descriptor label. I don't think it will be any collision with other Bay Trail patches, but I would like to have an immutable branch that I can pull into my tree (Intel pin control drivers). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko