From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/group_cpus: optimize inner loop in grp_spread_init_one()
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 14:07:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXJCHTphZ+0niIQB@yury-ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231207134521.c921cb0bb1ab7487d78aeb07@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:45:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:38:57 -0800 Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The loop starts from the beginning every time we switch to the next
> > sibling mask. This is the Schlemiel the Painter's style of coding
> > because we know for sure that nmsk is clear up to current CPU, and we
> > can just continue from the next CPU.
> >
> > Also, we can do it nicer if leverage the dedicated for_each() iterator.
> >
> > --- a/lib/group_cpus.c
> > +++ b/lib/group_cpus.c
> > @@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ static void grp_spread_init_one(struct cpumask *irqmsk, struct cpumask *nmsk,
> >
> > /* If the cpu has siblings, use them first */
> > siblmsk = topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
> > - for (sibl = -1; cpus_per_grp > 0; ) {
> > - sibl = cpumask_next(sibl, siblmsk);
> > - if (sibl >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > - break;
>
> I assume this test goes away because the iterator takes care of it?
Yes, correct.
>
> > + sibl = cpu + 1;
> > +
> > + for_each_cpu_and_from(sibl, siblmsk, nmsk) {
> > __cpumask_clear_cpu(sibl, nmsk);
> > __cpumask_set_cpu(sibl, irqmsk);
> > - cpus_per_grp--;
> > + if (cpus_per_grp-- == 0)
> > + return;
> > }
> > }
> > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 20:38 [PATCH v2 0/6] lib/group_cpus: rework grp_spread_init_one() and make it O(1) Yury Norov
2023-12-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] cpumask: introduce for_each_cpu_and_from() Yury Norov
2023-12-07 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-07 22:16 ` Yury Norov
2023-12-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/group_cpus: relax atomicity requirement in grp_spread_init_one() Yury Norov
2023-12-08 1:31 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-08 2:49 ` Yury Norov
2023-12-08 3:28 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/group_cpus: optimize inner loop " Yury Norov
2023-12-07 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-07 22:07 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2023-12-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] lib/group_cpus: optimize outer " Yury Norov
2023-12-07 20:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] lib/cgroup_cpus.c: don't zero cpumasks in group_cpus_evenly() on allocation Yury Norov
2023-12-07 20:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] lib/group_cpus.c: drop unneeded cpumask_empty() call in __group_cpus_evenly() Yury Norov
2023-12-07 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] lib/group_cpus: rework grp_spread_init_one() and make it O(1) Andrew Morton
2023-12-07 22:19 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXJCHTphZ+0niIQB@yury-ThinkPad \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox