Re: [PATCH v2 14/35] PCI: hv: switch hv_get_dom_num() to use atomic find_bit()

[Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 01:14:27PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:32:46AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The function traverses bitmap with for_each_clear_bit() just to allocate
> > a bit atomically. We can do it better with a dedicated find_and_set_bit().
> 
> No objection from me, but please tweak the subject line to match
> previous hv history, i.e., capitalize the first word after the prefix:
> 
>   PCI: hv: Use atomic find_and_set_bit()
> 
> I think there's value in using similar phrasing across the whole
> series.  Some subjects say "optimize xyz()", some say "rework xyz()",
> some "rework xyz()", etc.  I think it's more informative to include
> the "atomic" and "find_bit()" ideas in the subject than the specific
> functions that *use* it.
> 
> I also like how some of the other commit logs clearly say what the
> patch does, e.g., "Simplify by using dedicated find_and_set_bit()", as
> opposed to just "We can do it better ..." which technically doesn't
> say what the patch does.
> 
> Very nice simplification in all these users, thanks for doing it!
> 
> I assume you'll merge these all together since they depend on [01/35],
> so:
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Thank you Bjorn!

Now as many people asked to move their subsystems patch together with
#1, I think, if no objections, it's simpler to pull all the series in
bitmap-for-next.

I'm going to align commit messages wording, as you suggested, address
some other comments, and will send v3 this weekend.

Thanks,
Yury