From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:25:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXdiGqq0GBR++ONz@snowbird> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHVXubio372X_xXiWBMYk5=C7K49Wv6uki-uqWk1eyH-YuGGnA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:31:25AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 7:14 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the percpu tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> > defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > mm/percpu.c: In function 'pcpu_page_first_chunk':
> > mm/percpu.c:3336:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'flush_cache_vmap_early'; did you mean 'flush_cache_vmap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 3336 | flush_cache_vmap_early(unit_addr, unit_addr + ai->unit_size);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | flush_cache_vmap
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > a95c15a43f4a ("mm: Introduce flush_cache_vmap_early() and its riscv implementation")
> >
> > I have applied the following fix patch for today. Are there other
> > archs that don't use asm-generic/cacheflush.h?
>
I'm surprised automation didn't catch this as this should have failed
for any sparc build? It passed `sparc allmodconfig gcc` on my branches.
> It seems like most archs do not include this file, I should have
> checked. As I'm a bit scared of the possible side-effects of including
> asm-generic/cacheflush.h, I'll define flush_cache_vmap_early() on all
> archs that do define flush_cache_vmap().
>
Hmmm. That makes sense, but we'd still need to check so we have the
generic #ifndef definition included everywhere too.
> Stephen, do you want a patch fix? Or do you want me to send a new
> version of the current patches so that you can drop them for now?
>
The for-next tree gets recreated from pulls of the maintainers' trees.
I'm going to drop the series from percpu and then we can go again with a
v2.
> Sorry for the oversight,
>
All good it happens. It's why the automation is there.
Thanks,
Dennis
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:57:00 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "mm: Introduce flush_cache_vmap_early() and its riscv implementation"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > index 881ac76eab93..9d87b2bcb217 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> > @@ -10,4 +10,11 @@
> > #else
> > #include <asm/cacheflush_32.h>
> > #endif
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +static inline void flush_cache_vmap_early(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #endif
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-11 6:14 linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-11 8:31 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-12-11 19:25 ` Dennis Zhou [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-26 3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-27 4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-04 4:21 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-04 5:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-06 4:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-06 5:11 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXdiGqq0GBR++ONz@snowbird \
--to=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox