From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/core] x86: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE leaking timer reprogram
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 14:46:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXhkUshO49ldjBio@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130111519.GA20153@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:15:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is so, because all mwait users should be in __cpuidle section,
> which itself is part of the noinstr section and as such
> kprobes/hw-breakpoints etc.. are disallowed.
>
> Notable vmlinux.lds.h has:
>
> #define NOINSTR_TEXT \
> ALIGN_FUNCTION(); \
> __noinstr_text_start = .; \
> *(.noinstr.text) \
> __cpuidle_text_start = .; \
> *(.cpuidle.text) \
> __cpuidle_text_end = .; \
> __noinstr_text_end = .;
So #DB aren't supposed to happen then, right? Or you noticed an mwait
user that doesn't have __cpuidle?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 15:13 [PATCH 0/4] x86/cpuidle fixes and optimization Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: Add a comment about the "magic" behind shadow sti before mwait Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-29 14:55 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE leaking timer reprogram Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-15 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-29 14:55 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-30 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-12-12 13:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Remove __current_clr_polling() from mwait_idle() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-16 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-16 18:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Remove the current_clr_polling() call upon mwait exit Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXhkUshO49ldjBio@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox