Re: [PATCH 10/26] KVM: s390: Stop selecting and depending on HAVE_KVM

Claudio Imbrenda
2023-09-18T15:22:56Z

On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:31:02 -0700
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:

> Now that nothing in s390 or architecture agnostic code consumes HAVE_KVM,
> stop selecting it in s390. This is one of several steps towards deleting
> HAVE_KVM from the common KVM Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index ae29e4392664..8a5dca0036d9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ config S390
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - select HAVE_KVM
> select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
> index 459d536116a6..9056cee72945 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION
> config KVM
> def_tristate y
> prompt "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support"
> - depends on HAVE_KVM
> select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
> select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
> select HAVE_KVM_VCPU_ASYNC_IOCTL

it looks like we don't use HAVE_KVM on s390x

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>