From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Fix boot when QRTR=m
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:38:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXshe83quTE0jO_Z@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXsMoFiivUCWA0yr@hovoldconsulting.com>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:09:36PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:04:49PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 16:01, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:04:43PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > This is a known problem. Successful probes during the probe deferral
> > > > loop causes the whole loop to be reiterated. Creating child devices
> > > > usually results in a successful probe. Aso I thought that just
> > > > creating new device also causes a reprobe, but I can not find any
> > > > evidence now.
> > >
> > > This still needs to be described in the commit message.
> > >
> > > Only a successful probe should trigger a reprobe, and when the child
> > > devices are registered the parent is not yet on the deferred probe list.
> > > So something is not right or missing here.
> >
> > Child devices can be successfully probed, then the parent gets
> > -EPROBE_DEFER, removes children and then it goes on and on.
>
> So what? As I described above, the successful probe of the children
> should have nothing to do with whether the parent is reprobed.
>
> If that isn't the case, then explain how.
I took a closer look at this and indeed we do have code that triggers a
reprobe of a device in case there was a successful probe while the
device was probing.
This was introduced by commit 58b116bce136 ("drivercore: deferral race
condition fix") and the workaround for the reprobe-loop bug that hack
led to is to not return -EPROBE_DEFER after registering child devices as
no one managed to come up with a proper fix. This was documented here:
fbc35b45f9f6 ("Add documentation on meaning of -EPROBE_DEFER")
But please spell this out in some more detail in the commit message, and
add a Fixes and CC stable tag.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 21:06 [PATCH] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Fix boot when QRTR=m Rob Clark
2023-12-14 7:16 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-14 11:04 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-14 14:01 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-14 14:04 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-14 14:09 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-14 15:38 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2023-12-14 16:08 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-14 20:44 ` Rob Clark
2023-12-15 7:50 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXshe83quTE0jO_Z@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox