From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
yu.c.chen@intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: move access of avg_rt and avg_dl into existing helper functions
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:53:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYNGShf8SYMkhRic@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCRoLULQkRTZcJfXvSSqZYV2oRN0a3_AFiuqD7k0LtL-Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 07:55, Shrikanth Hegde
> <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is a minor code simplification. There are helper functions called
> > cpu_util_dl and cpu_util_rt which gives the average utilization of DL
> > and RT respectively. But there are few places in code where these
> > variables are used directly.
> >
> > Instead use the helper function so that code becomes simpler and easy to
> > maintain later on.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index bcea3d55d95d..02631060ca7e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -9212,19 +9212,17 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >
> > static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq)
> > {
> > - if (READ_ONCE(rq->avg_rt.util_avg))
> > + if (cpu_util_rt(rq))
> > return true;
> >
> > - if (READ_ONCE(rq->avg_dl.util_avg))
> > + if (cpu_util_dl(rq))
> > return true;
> >
> > if (thermal_load_avg(rq))
> > return true;
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SCHED_AVG_IRQ
> > - if (READ_ONCE(rq->avg_irq.util_avg))
> > + if (cpu_util_irq(rq))
>
> cpu_util_irq doesn't call READ_ONCE()
Oh, that's nasty - according to the title only avg_rt and avg_dl were
changed, which I double checked, but the patch indeed does more ...
I've removed this patch from tip:sched/core.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 6:55 [PATCH] sched: move access of avg_rt and avg_dl into existing helper functions Shrikanth Hegde
2023-12-20 10:11 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Use existing helper functions to access ->avg_rt and ->avg_dl tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2023-12-20 13:59 ` [PATCH] sched: move access of avg_rt and avg_dl into existing helper functions Vincent Guittot
2023-12-20 14:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-12-21 16:16 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-12-22 8:02 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-12-20 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYNGShf8SYMkhRic@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox