From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] Rework & improve riscv cmpxchg.h and atomic.h
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 00:07:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYZPA-Ugfowk1VXq@LeoBras> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZP2DVap64lJZj9g4@gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:50:29AM -0400, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 01:03:42AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > While studying riscv's cmpxchg.h file, I got really interested in
> > understanding how RISCV asm implemented the different versions of
> > {cmp,}xchg.
> >
> > When I understood the pattern, it made sense for me to remove the
> > duplications and create macros to make it easier to understand what exactly
> > changes between the versions: Instruction sufixes & barriers.
> >
> > Also, did the same kind of work on atomic.c.
> >
> > After that, I noted both cmpxchg and xchg only accept variables of
> > size 4 and 8, compared to x86 and arm64 which do 1,2,4,8.
> >
> > Now that deduplication is done, it is quite direct to implement them
> > for variable sizes 1 and 2, so I did it. Then Guo Ren already presented
> > me some possible users :)
> >
> > I did compare the generated asm on a test.c that contained usage for every
> > changed function, and could not detect any change on patches 1 + 2 + 3
> > compared with upstream.
> >
> > Pathes 4 & 5 were compiled-tested, merged with guoren/qspinlock_v11 and
> > booted just fine with qemu -machine virt -append "qspinlock".
> >
> > (tree: https://gitlab.com/LeoBras/linux/-/commits/guo_qspinlock_v11)
> Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
>
Hello Guo Ren, thanks for testing!
I will resend this series, and I would like to understand how should I put
your Tested-by over this patchset:
Is it ok if I add it on each patch of this series?
Thanks!
Leo
> Sorry for late reply, because we are stress testing CNA qspinlock on
> sg2042 128 cores hardware platform. This series has passed our test for
> several weeks. For more detail, ref:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230910082911.3378782-1-guoren@kernel.org/
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Leo
> >
> > Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv4:
> > - Added (__typeof__(*(p))) before returning from {cmp,}xchg, as done
> > in current upstream, (possibly) fixing the bug from kernel test robot
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230809021311.1390578-2-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv3:
> > - Fixed bug on cmpxchg macro for var size 1 & 2: now working
> > - Macros for var size 1 & 2's lr.w and sc.w now are guaranteed to receive
> > input of a 32-bit aligned address
> > - Renamed internal macros from _mask to _masked for patches 4 & 5
> > - __rc variable on macros for var size 1 & 2 changed from register to ulong
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230804084900.1135660-2-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv2:
> > - Removed rc parameter from the new macro: it can be internal to the macro
> > - 2 new patches: cmpxchg size 1 and 2, xchg size 1 and 2
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230803051401.710236-2-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv1:
> > - Unified with atomic.c patchset
> > - Rebased on top of torvalds/master (thanks Andrea Parri!)
> > - Removed helper macros that were not being used elsewhere in the kernel.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419062505.257231-1-leobras@redhat.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230406082018.70367-1-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Changes since (cmpxchg) RFCv3:
> > - Squashed the 6 original patches in 2: one for cmpxchg and one for xchg
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230404163741.2762165-1-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Changes since (cmpxchg) RFCv2:
> > - Fixed macros that depend on having a local variable with a magic name
> > - Previous cast to (long) is now only applied on 4-bytes cmpxchg
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321074249.2221674-1-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Changes since (cmpxchg) RFCv1:
> > - Fixed patch 4/6 suffix from 'w.aqrl' to '.w.aqrl', to avoid build error
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230318080059.1109286-1-leobras@redhat.com/
> >
> > Leonardo Bras (5):
> > riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate xchg() asm functions
> > riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate cmpxchg() asm and macros
> > riscv/atomic.h : Deduplicate arch_atomic.*
> > riscv/cmpxchg: Implement cmpxchg for variables of size 1 and 2
> > riscv/cmpxchg: Implement xchg for variables of size 1 and 2
> >
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h | 164 ++++++-------
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 404 ++++++++++---------------------
> > 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 368 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: cacc6e22932f373a91d7be55a9b992dc77f4c59b
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-23 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 4:03 [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] Rework & improve riscv cmpxchg.h and atomic.h Leonardo Bras
2023-08-10 4:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate xchg() asm functions Leonardo Bras
2023-08-10 4:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate cmpxchg() asm and macros Leonardo Bras
2023-08-10 4:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/5] riscv/atomic.h : Deduplicate arch_atomic.* Leonardo Bras
2023-08-10 4:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Implement cmpxchg for variables of size 1 and 2 Leonardo Bras
2023-08-10 4:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 5/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Implement xchg " Leonardo Bras
2023-08-10 6:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-10 16:04 ` Leonardo Brás
2023-08-10 16:23 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-08-10 19:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-11 1:24 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-30 21:51 ` Leonardo Brás
2023-08-11 1:40 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-11 6:27 ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-11 9:48 ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-11 11:10 ` Andrew Jones
2023-08-11 11:16 ` Guo Ren
2023-08-30 21:59 ` Leonardo Brás
2023-09-06 21:15 ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2023-12-06 0:56 ` leobras.c
2024-01-03 11:05 ` Jisheng Zhang
2024-01-03 15:31 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] Rework & improve riscv cmpxchg.h and atomic.h Guo Ren
2023-09-12 0:22 ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2023-12-23 3:07 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2023-12-23 3:15 ` Guo Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYZPA-Ugfowk1VXq@LeoBras \
--to=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox