From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangzekun11@huawei.com,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, dheerajkumar.srivastava@amd.com,
jsnitsel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iommu/iova: Make the rcache depot properly flexible
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:20:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZ-ky9UCoHwbyqfn@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZZ7atzgT6_kOvWnJ@arm.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 05:58:15PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Transient false positives are possible, especially as the code doesn't
> use a double-linked list (for the latter, kmemleak does checksumming and
> detects the prev/next change, defers the reporting until the object
> becomes stable). That said, if a new scan is forced (echo scan >
> /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak), are the same objects still listed as leaks?
> If yes, they may not be transient.
We are doing "scan" and "clear" after each test. I will disable the
"clear" and see if the leaks persist.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 16:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] iommu/iova: Make the rcache depot properly flexible Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] iommu/iova: Make the rcache depot scale better Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] iommu/iova: Manage the depot list size Robin Murphy
2023-09-25 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] iommu/iova: Make the rcache depot properly flexible Joerg Roedel
2023-12-28 12:23 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-01-02 7:24 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-01-03 8:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-01-06 4:21 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-06 7:07 ` zhangzekun (A)
2024-01-06 7:33 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-06 4:03 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-08 3:13 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-08 17:35 ` Robin Murphy
2024-01-09 5:54 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-09 6:23 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-09 11:26 ` Robin Murphy
2024-01-10 0:52 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-09 17:21 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-01-10 12:48 ` Robin Murphy
2024-01-10 14:00 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-01-10 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-11 8:20 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-01-11 10:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-12 15:31 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-01-15 7:17 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-10-28 8:04 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-10-28 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZ-ky9UCoHwbyqfn@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dheerajkumar.srivastava@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangzekun11@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox