Re: [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs: Protect kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() with RCU

[Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:48:01AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id()
> which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock.
> kernfs_idr_lock used to be a non-irq-safe lock which could lead to deadlocks
> as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF programs including e.g.
> the ones that attach to functions which are holding the scheduler rq lock.
> 
> To resolve the situation dad3fb67ca1c ("kernfs: convert kernfs_idr_lock to
> an irq safe raw spinlock") converted kernfs_idr_lock to an irq-safe raw
> spinlock. However, this was also broken as we call idr_alloc*() while
> holding the lock and idr itself uses an non-irq-safe lock and also calls
> into memory allocator.
> 
> Let's instead RCU protect kernfs_node and kernfs_root so that
> kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() can use rcu_read_lock() instead of
> kernfs_idr_lock. While this unfortunately increases the size of kernfs_node,
> it's the most straightforward thing to do and there likely are other places
> that can take advantage of RCU protection and improve scalability too.
> 
> Please see the patch descriptions for more details.
> 
> This patchset is on top of the current driver-core-next - dad3fb67ca1c
> ("kernfs: convert kernfs_idr_lock to an irq safe raw spinlock"), and also
> available in the following git branch.
> 
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git kernfs-use-rcu
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> tejun

Everything looks good to me and I can't trigger any oops with this one
applied. You can add my:

Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>

Thanks!
-Andrea