public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'peterz@infradead.org'" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"'longman@redhat.com'" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"'mingo@redhat.com'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"'will@kernel.org'" <will@kernel.org>,
	"'boqun.feng@gmail.com'" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com'" <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"'virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org'"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	'Zeng Heng' <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 4/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise per-cpu data accesses.
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 21:37:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZB/jIvKgKQ2sV7M@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bddb6b00434d4492abca4725c10f8d5a@AcuMS.aculab.com>


* David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:

>  bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
>  {
> -	struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
> +	struct optimistic_spin_node *node = raw_cpu_read(osq_node.self);
>  	struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next;
>  	int old;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(node->cpu == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL))
> -		node->cpu = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
> +	if (unlikely(!node)) {
> +		int cpu = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
> +		node = decode_cpu(cpu);
> +		node->self = node;
> +		node->cpu = cpu;

This whole initialization sequence is suboptimal and needs to be 
cleaned up first: the node->cpu field is constant once initialized, so 
it should be initialized from appropriate init methods, not runtime in 
osq_lock(), right?

Eliminating that initialization branch is a useful micro-optimization 
in itself for the hot path.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-30 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-29 20:51 [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code David Laight
2023-12-29 20:53 ` [PATCH next 1/5] locking/osq_lock: Move the definition of optimistic_spin_node into osf_lock.c David Laight
2023-12-30  1:59   ` Waiman Long
2023-12-29 20:54 ` [PATCH next 2/5] locking/osq_lock: Avoid dirtying the local cpu's 'node' in the osq_lock() fast path David Laight
2023-12-29 20:56 ` [PATCH next 3/5] locking/osq_lock: Clarify osq_wait_next() David Laight
2023-12-29 22:54   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-12-30  2:54   ` Waiman Long
2023-12-29 20:57 ` [PATCH next 4/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise per-cpu data accesses David Laight
2023-12-30  3:08   ` Waiman Long
2023-12-30 11:09     ` Ingo Molnar
2023-12-30 11:35       ` David Laight
2023-12-31  3:04         ` Waiman Long
2023-12-31 10:36           ` David Laight
2023-12-30 20:37   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-12-30 22:47     ` David Laight
2023-12-30 20:41   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-12-30 20:59     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-12-31 11:56       ` David Laight
2023-12-31 11:41     ` David Laight
2023-12-29 20:58 ` [PATCH next 5/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise vcpu_is_preempted() check David Laight
2023-12-30  3:13   ` Waiman Long
2023-12-30 15:57     ` Waiman Long
2023-12-30 22:37       ` David Laight
2023-12-29 22:11 ` [PATCH next 2/5] locking/osq_lock: Avoid dirtying the local cpu's 'node' in the osq_lock() fast path David Laight
2023-12-30  3:20   ` Waiman Long
2023-12-30 15:49     ` David Laight
2024-01-02 18:53       ` Boqun Feng
2024-01-02 23:32         ` David Laight
2023-12-30 19:40 ` [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code Linus Torvalds
2023-12-30 22:39   ` David Laight
2023-12-31  2:14     ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZZB/jIvKgKQ2sV7M@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox