From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Rework & improve riscv cmpxchg.h and atomic.h
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:34:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZWMox3D2GHX0Tzr@LeoBras> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103163203.72768-2-leobras@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 01:31:58PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> While studying riscv's cmpxchg.h file, I got really interested in
> understanding how RISCV asm implemented the different versions of
> {cmp,}xchg.
>
> When I understood the pattern, it made sense for me to remove the
> duplications and create macros to make it easier to understand what exactly
> changes between the versions: Instruction sufixes & barriers.
>
> Also, did the same kind of work on atomic.c.
>
> After that, I noted both cmpxchg and xchg only accept variables of
> size 4 and 8, compared to x86 and arm64 which do 1,2,4,8.
>
> Now that deduplication is done, it is quite direct to implement them
> for variable sizes 1 and 2, so I did it. Then Guo Ren already presented
> me some possible users :)
>
> I did compare the generated asm on a test.c that contained usage for every
> changed function, and could not detect any change on patches 1 + 2 + 3
> compared with upstream.
>
> Pathes 4 & 5 were compiled-tested, merged with guoren/qspinlock_v11 and
> booted just fine with qemu -machine virt -append "qspinlock".
>
> (tree: https://gitlab.com/LeoBras/linux/-/commits/guo_qspinlock_v11)
>
> Latest tests happened based on this tree:
> https://github.com/guoren83/linux/tree/qspinlock_v12
>
> Thanks!
> Leo
>
> Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv5:
> - Resend as v1
Oh, forgot to mention:
I added some of Reviewed-by that were missing.
Thanks Guo Ren!
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230810040349.92279-2-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv4:
> - Added (__typeof__(*(p))) before returning from {cmp,}xchg, as done
> in current upstream, (possibly) fixing the bug from kernel test robot
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230809021311.1390578-2-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv3:
> - Fixed bug on cmpxchg macro for var size 1 & 2: now working
> - Macros for var size 1 & 2's lr.w and sc.w now are guaranteed to receive
> input of a 32-bit aligned address
> - Renamed internal macros from _mask to _masked for patches 4 & 5
> - __rc variable on macros for var size 1 & 2 changed from register to ulong
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230804084900.1135660-2-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv2:
> - Removed rc parameter from the new macro: it can be internal to the macro
> - 2 new patches: cmpxchg size 1 and 2, xchg size 1 and 2
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230803051401.710236-2-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since squashed cmpxchg RFCv1:
> - Unified with atomic.c patchset
> - Rebased on top of torvalds/master (thanks Andrea Parri!)
> - Removed helper macros that were not being used elsewhere in the kernel.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419062505.257231-1-leobras@redhat.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230406082018.70367-1-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since (cmpxchg) RFCv3:
> - Squashed the 6 original patches in 2: one for cmpxchg and one for xchg
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230404163741.2762165-1-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since (cmpxchg) RFCv2:
> - Fixed macros that depend on having a local variable with a magic name
> - Previous cast to (long) is now only applied on 4-bytes cmpxchg
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321074249.2221674-1-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Changes since (cmpxchg) RFCv1:
> - Fixed patch 4/6 suffix from 'w.aqrl' to '.w.aqrl', to avoid build error
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230318080059.1109286-1-leobras@redhat.com/
>
> Leonardo Bras (5):
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate xchg() asm functions
> riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate cmpxchg() asm and macros
> riscv/atomic.h : Deduplicate arch_atomic.*
> riscv/cmpxchg: Implement cmpxchg for variables of size 1 and 2
> riscv/cmpxchg: Implement xchg for variables of size 1 and 2
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h | 164 ++++++-------
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 404 ++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 368 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 610a9b8f49fbcf1100716370d3b5f6f884a2835a
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 16:31 [PATCH v1 0/5] Rework & improve riscv cmpxchg.h and atomic.h Leonardo Bras
2024-01-03 16:31 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate xchg() asm functions Leonardo Bras
2024-01-04 19:53 ` Boqun Feng
2024-01-04 20:41 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-04 21:51 ` Boqun Feng
2024-01-05 4:45 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-05 5:18 ` Boqun Feng
2024-01-05 6:59 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-13 6:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-16 19:27 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-03 16:32 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Deduplicate cmpxchg() asm and macros Leonardo Bras
2024-01-03 16:32 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] riscv/atomic.h : Deduplicate arch_atomic.* Leonardo Bras
2024-01-03 16:32 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Implement cmpxchg for variables of size 1 and 2 Leonardo Bras
2024-01-03 16:32 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] riscv/cmpxchg: Implement xchg " Leonardo Bras
2024-01-03 16:34 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2024-04-10 14:20 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] Rework & improve riscv cmpxchg.h and atomic.h patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZWMox3D2GHX0Tzr@LeoBras \
--to=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox