* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-04-03 20:22 ` Pavel Machek
2025-04-03 20:52 ` Peter Schneider
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-04-03 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.13.y
6.12 and 6.6 pass our testing, too:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.12.y
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.6.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-03 20:22 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2025-04-03 20:52 ` Peter Schneider
2025-04-04 12:02 ` Mark Brown
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-04-03 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 03.04.2025 um 17:20 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-03 20:22 ` Pavel Machek
2025-04-03 20:52 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-04-04 12:02 ` Mark Brown
2025-04-04 14:46 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-04-04 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 04:20:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-04 12:02 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-04-04 14:46 ` Shuah Khan
2025-04-04 16:47 ` Florian Fainelli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-04-04 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 4/3/25 09:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-04 14:46 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-04-04 16:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-04-04 19:30 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-04-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 4/3/25 08:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-04 16:47 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-04-04 19:30 ` Jon Hunter
2025-04-04 21:39 ` Justin Forbes
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-04-04 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:20:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.13:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.13.10-rc1-g8cbfaadfa0ec
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-04 19:30 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-04-04 21:39 ` Justin Forbes
2025-04-05 2:11 ` Ron Economos
2025-04-05 6:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2025-04-04 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 04:20:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x,
x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-04 21:39 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2025-04-05 2:11 ` Ron Economos
2025-04-05 6:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-04-05 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 4/3/25 08:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-03 15:20 [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-05 2:11 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-04-05 6:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-04-05 10:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
8 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-04-05 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
clang-built-linux, Nathan Chancellor,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 20:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Regressions on arm, arm64 and x86_64.
1)
The selftests rseq failed across the boards and virtual environments.
These test failures were also noticed on Linux mainline and next.
We will bisect these lists of regressions and get back to you.
* kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
2)
The clang-nightly build issues reported on mainline and next.
* S390, powerpc, build
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
clang-nightly: ERROR: modpost: "wcslen" [fs/smb/client/cifs.ko] undefined!
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuQHeGicnEx1d=XBC0p1LCsndi5q0p86V7pCZ02d8Fv_w@mail.gmail.com/
3)
The clang-nightly boot regressions with no console output have been
reported on mainline and next.
* boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug
v6.14-12245-g91e5bfe317d8: Boot regression: rk3399-rock-pi-4b
dragonboard-410c dragonboard-845c no console output
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYve7+nXJNoV48TksXoMeVjgJuP8Gs=+1br+Qur1DPWV4A@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.13.10-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 8cbfaadfa0ec371208123554d6ad9994433929bb
* git describe: v6.13.7-385-g8cbfaadfa0ec
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.13.y/build/v6.13.7-385-g8cbfaadfa0ec
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)
* arm, build
- clang-nightly-nhk8815_defconfig
* arm64, build
- clang-nightly-allyesconfig
* dragonboard-410c, boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
* dragonboard-845c, boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug
* e850-96, boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
* fvp-aemva, boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
* juno-r2, boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
* dragonboard-410c, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
* dragonboard-845c, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
* e850-96, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
* powerpc, build
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
- clang-nightly-ppc64e_defconfig
* qemu-arm64, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
* qemu-i386, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
- shardfile-rseq
* qemu-x86_64, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
* rk3399-rock-pi-4b, boot
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
* s390, build
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
* x86, kselftest-rseq
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
- rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
- rseq_basic_test
- rseq_param_test
- rseq_param_test_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_compare_twice
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
- rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
* x86_64, build
- clang-nightly-allyesconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)
## Test result summary
total: 125983, pass: 99795, fail: 7289, skip: 18899, xfail: 0
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 136 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 56 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 35 passed, 5 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 23 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 22 total, 18 passed, 4 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
2025-04-05 6:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-04-05 10:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-04-05 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
clang-built-linux, Nathan Chancellor,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 11:50:59AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 20:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Regressions on arm, arm64 and x86_64.
>
> 1)
> The selftests rseq failed across the boards and virtual environments.
> These test failures were also noticed on Linux mainline and next.
>
> We will bisect these lists of regressions and get back to you.
Thanks, this I'll care about, but:
> * kselftest-rseq
> - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
> - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
> - rseq_basic_test
> - rseq_param_test
> - rseq_param_test_benchmark
> - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
> - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
> - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
> - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
>
> 2)
> The clang-nightly build issues reported on mainline and next.
>
> * S390, powerpc, build
> - clang-nightly-defconfig
> - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
> - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
> - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
>
> clang-nightly: ERROR: modpost: "wcslen" [fs/smb/client/cifs.ko] undefined!
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuQHeGicnEx1d=XBC0p1LCsndi5q0p86V7pCZ02d8Fv_w@mail.gmail.com/
>
> 3)
> The clang-nightly boot regressions with no console output have been
> reported on mainline and next.
These 2 I don't, as that's a mainline issue first.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread