From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.16] sched_ext: Remove cpu.weight / cpu.idle unimplemented warnings
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:20:04 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_RdpDkLCXm140RT@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
sched_ext generates warnings when cpu.weight / cpu.idle are set to
non-default values if the BPF scheduler doesn't implement weight support.
These warnings don't provide much value while adding constant annoyance. A
BPF scheduler may not implement any particular behavior and there's nothing
particularly special about missing cgroup weight support. Drop the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 40 +---------------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 39 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3896,34 +3896,6 @@ bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(scx_cgroup_rwsem);
static bool scx_cgroup_enabled;
-static bool cgroup_warned_missing_weight;
-static bool cgroup_warned_missing_idle;
-
-static void scx_cgroup_warn_missing_weight(struct task_group *tg)
-{
- if (scx_enable_state() == SCX_DISABLED || cgroup_warned_missing_weight)
- return;
-
- if ((scx_ops.flags & SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT) || !tg->css.parent)
- return;
-
- pr_warn("sched_ext: \"%s\" does not implement cgroup cpu.weight\n",
- scx_ops.name);
- cgroup_warned_missing_weight = true;
-}
-
-static void scx_cgroup_warn_missing_idle(struct task_group *tg)
-{
- if (!scx_cgroup_enabled || cgroup_warned_missing_idle)
- return;
-
- if (!tg->idle)
- return;
-
- pr_warn("sched_ext: \"%s\" does not implement cgroup cpu.idle\n",
- scx_ops.name);
- cgroup_warned_missing_idle = true;
-}
int scx_tg_online(struct task_group *tg)
{
@@ -3933,8 +3905,6 @@ int scx_tg_online(struct task_group *tg)
percpu_down_read(&scx_cgroup_rwsem);
- scx_cgroup_warn_missing_weight(tg);
-
if (scx_cgroup_enabled) {
if (SCX_HAS_OP(cgroup_init)) {
struct scx_cgroup_init_args args =
@@ -4072,9 +4042,7 @@ void scx_group_set_weight(struct task_gr
void scx_group_set_idle(struct task_group *tg, bool idle)
{
- percpu_down_read(&scx_cgroup_rwsem);
- scx_cgroup_warn_missing_idle(tg);
- percpu_up_read(&scx_cgroup_rwsem);
+ /* TODO: Implement ops->cgroup_set_idle() */
}
static void scx_cgroup_lock(void)
@@ -4268,9 +4236,6 @@ static int scx_cgroup_init(void)
percpu_rwsem_assert_held(&scx_cgroup_rwsem);
- cgroup_warned_missing_weight = false;
- cgroup_warned_missing_idle = false;
-
/*
* scx_tg_on/offline() are excluded through scx_cgroup_rwsem. If we walk
* cgroups and init, all online cgroups are initialized.
@@ -4280,9 +4245,6 @@ static int scx_cgroup_init(void)
struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
struct scx_cgroup_init_args args = { .weight = tg->scx_weight };
- scx_cgroup_warn_missing_weight(tg);
- scx_cgroup_warn_missing_idle(tg);
-
if ((tg->scx_flags &
(SCX_TG_ONLINE | SCX_TG_INITED)) != SCX_TG_ONLINE)
continue;
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 23:20 Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-04-08 1:23 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.16] sched_ext: Remove cpu.weight / cpu.idle unimplemented warnings Changwoo Min
2025-04-08 7:58 ` Andrea Righi
2025-04-08 18:12 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.15-fixes] sched_ext: Mark SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT for deprecation Tejun Heo
2025-04-08 18:28 ` Andrea Righi
2025-04-08 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
2025-04-08 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2025-04-08 18:41 ` Andrea Righi
2025-04-08 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2025-04-08 17:55 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.16] sched_ext: Remove cpu.weight / cpu.idle unimplemented warnings Tejun Heo
2025-04-08 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_RdpDkLCXm140RT@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox