From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C0026A0C7; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744114679; cv=none; b=M+USVJhko8inAo4ja9cVHi2iIF1wROLzBr4C3D6LPlgY26Ri+4bZflhNzuYhq6sxuk5akZmuONM2b4nWvYST4Y2RIcBXFA3C3Ah0I//EYzymA3TiK1rZMrSMSk5QWYGaB+rgZL27lyiyrJbsjstH9ixTCRFVTdkh8x0dK+Jljk8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744114679; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wxu/kgA0ZBt/CwKezJfoWAwagQUkrF5hrbJY+oup8mU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GQS+wSGXDhVEvSWNQpRAV4rqbipjn+VRGaJwErvK8xndzHAUG6K6QtHkm9p7XZ8LXs3fsVSPThNkaU1j19aDnL1B83TZFXbtr1jeRTfa7NqMZFYmfxjDkERQgXBMHaRSDmFXjLLzFOJ6aa55rPFDyB0UQwXh10ujigVzXNtXJFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Nw/LeWzn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Nw/LeWzn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744114678; x=1775650678; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Wxu/kgA0ZBt/CwKezJfoWAwagQUkrF5hrbJY+oup8mU=; b=Nw/LeWznEgW/C1FskeBykjEPLB3U4G+mG4kTaxJ3WxQ8c8Am+tXN4Qfc Rsl2AmivRzGNxRE1mikkoZEDh2N8FVZbf+AB2nJ3wEiAO5Hk/NTD15iyq o7j4Z3JtUTLHSswATUwzKj4j6WZXTXUpOyKJ67c2eUQWlfnD/0iBC6fJn zI1PwyLbYGbCzScGnmB3k3RC/sT48OnaOq75zNsO9qEYf2yBIPRt9/b6l mXgbAo3/j07y1S9aTTj/Hy/pMbIPegZO3Jr6be1/YeXG2+y0kIXlTTNOS NPtdsIV/KgVFX0Rfn7jCzpTtfthNHFBwfe7/zaGB7bPLu4aLIQDs4Bj9j Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bSg8cpWeT3uDykXMRrTWIQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7axDrhlaRC6NhUpWX+encQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11397"; a="45703820" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,198,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="45703820" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2025 05:17:57 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Lfg4emesQDS0yX6oTFIcMQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4TIMEt29TbSFKio7KdkqfA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,198,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="133408560" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2025 05:17:56 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u27tq-0000000AOdl-1imc; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 15:17:54 +0300 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 15:17:54 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] media: v4l2-core: Replace the check for firmware registered I2C devices Message-ID: References: <20250313113115.359942-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 07:16:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:30:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Replace the check for firmware registered I²C devices as the firmware node > > independently on type should be retrieved via dev_fwnode(). > > Hans, are you okay with this now? Can it be applied? Is this fell into cracks? Also, can somebody harvest those pretty much simple one- or so liners that I have sent last week(s)? They all basically in a way about fwnode. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko