From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>,
Timothy Day <timday@amazon.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Update main API document
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:34:39 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_XOr4Ak4S0EOdrw@archie.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565252.1744124997@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3031 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:09:57PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> + * For writeback, it is unknown how much there will be to write until the
"... will be written ..."
> + pagecache is walked, so no limit is set by the library.
> <snipped>...
> +Further, if a read from the cache fails, the library will ask the filesystem to
> +do the read instead, renegotiating and retiling the subrequests as necessary.
Read from the filesystem itself or direct read?
> +When writeback occurs, folios that are so marked will only be written to the
> +cache and not to the server. Writeback handles mixed cache-only writes and
> +server-and-cache writes by using two streams, sending one to the cache and one
> +to the server. The server stream will have gaps in it corresponding to those
"... and another to the server."
> +folios.
> +
> <snipped>...
> +Netfslib will pin resources on an inode for future writeback (such as pinning
> +use of an fscache cookie) when an inode is dirtied. However, this needs
> +managing. Firstly, a function is provided to unpin the writeback in
inode management?
> +``->write_inode()``::
>
> <snipped>...
> +The fields generally of interest to a filesystem are::
>
> struct netfs_io_request {
> + enum netfs_io_origin origin;
> struct inode *inode;
> struct address_space *mapping;
> - struct netfs_cache_resources cache_resources;
> + struct netfs_group *group;
> + struct netfs_io_stream io_streams[];
> void *netfs_priv;
> - loff_t start;
> - size_t len;
> - loff_t i_size;
> - const struct netfs_request_ops *netfs_ops;
> + void *netfs_priv2;
> + unsigned long long start;
> + unsigned long long len;
> + unsigned long long i_size;
> unsigned int debug_id;
> + unsigned long flags;
> ...
> };
>
> -The above fields are the ones the netfs can use. They are:
> +They are:
"These fields are, in detail:"
> <snipped>...
> +The stream struct looks like::
"The stream struct is defined as::"
> +
> + struct netfs_io_stream {
> + unsigned char stream_nr;
> + bool avail;
> + size_t sreq_max_len;
> + unsigned int sreq_max_segs;
> + unsigned int submit_extendable_to;
> + ...
> + };
> +
> <snipped>...
> +The table starts with a pair of optional pointers to memory pools from which
> +requests and subrequests can be allocated. If these are not given, netfslib
> +has default pools that it will use. If the filesystem wraps the netfs structs
"... it will use instead."
> +in its own larger structs, then it will need to use its own pools. Netfslib
> +will allocate directly from the pools.
>
> <snipped>...
> + This is not permitted to return an error. In the event of failure,
> + ``netfs_prepare_write_failed()`` must be called.
"This method is not permitted to return an error. Instead, in the event of
failure, ..."
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 15:09 [PATCH] netfs: Update main API document David Howells
2025-04-09 1:34 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2025-04-09 9:05 ` David Howells
2025-04-09 10:10 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-09 13:24 ` David Howells
2025-04-09 13:54 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v2] " David Howells
2025-04-11 13:24 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_XOr4Ak4S0EOdrw@archie.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=timday@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox