From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 20:52:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_bCA8788lrr-NdB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409122233.1058601-2-darwi@linutronix.de>
* Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de> wrote:
> For the AMD CPUID(4) emulation cache info logic, the same associativity
> mapping array, assocs[], is used for both CPUID(0x80000005) and
> CPUID(0x80000006).
>
> This is incorrect since per the AMD manuals, the mappings for
> CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity is:
>
> n = 0x1 -> 0xfe n
> n = 0xff fully associative
>
> while assocs[] maps these values to:
>
> n = 0x1, 0x2, 0x4 n
> n = 0x3, 0x7, 0x9 0
> n = 0x6 8
> n = 0x8 16
> n = 0xa 32
> n = 0xb 48
> n = 0xc 64
> n = 0xd 96
> n = 0xe 128
> n = 0xf fully associative
>
> which is only valid for CPUID(0x80000006).
>
> Parse CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity values as shown in the AMD
> manuals. Since the 0xffff literal is used to denote full associativity
> at the AMD CPUID(4)-emulation logic, define AMD_CPUID4_FULLY_ASSOCIATIVE
> for it instead of spreading that literal in more places.
>
> Mark the assocs[] mapping array as only valid for CPUID(0x80000006) L2/L3
> cache information.
>
> Fixes: a326e948c538 ("x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
Yeah, so a Cc: stable tag is usually reserved for recent regressions,
or critical fixes - but this is a bug from 2009, ~16 years old. This
bug is old enough to receive a driving license in the US, and can
legally buy beer or wine in Germany.
So I've removed the tags from the two commits in tip:x86/cpu, but note
that the Fixes tag itself will give backporters enough information so
they can decide on whether to backport. Greg's -stable process
typically processes all Fixes tags for example, once Linus pulls this
into v6.16-to-be.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 12:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/cacheinfo: Fixes for CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-04-09 12:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-04-09 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-04-10 5:53 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-04-09 19:40 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-04-09 12:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000006) L2/L3 associativity Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-04-09 19:40 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_bCA8788lrr-NdB@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox