From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v6.15-rc1] perf libunwind arm64: Fix missing close parens in an if statement
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:51:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_hndlFEnn5DHjvL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_Z3o8KvB2i5c6ab@x1>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 10:35:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> While testing building with libunwind (using LIBUNWIND=1) in various
> arches I noticed a problem on arm64, on an rpi5 system, a missing close
> parens in a change related to dso__data_get_fd() usage, fix it.
>
> Fixes: 5ac22c35aa8519f1 ("perf dso: Use lock annotations to fix asan deadlock")
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Thanks for fixing this. For some reason the build test couldn't detect
it on my system (I have libunwind-dev installed).
I'll add it to perf-tools tree.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> ---
> tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
> index 9fb2c1343c7fe205..0b037e7389a009f5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static int read_unwind_spec_debug_frame(struct dso *dso,
> * has to be pointed by symsrc_filename
> */
> if (ofs == 0) {
> - if (dso__data_get_fd(dso, machine, &fd) {
> + if (dso__data_get_fd(dso, machine, &fd)) {
> ofs = elf_section_offset(fd, ".debug_frame");
> dso__data_put_fd(dso);
> }
> --
> 2.48.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 13:35 [PATCH 1/1 v6.15-rc1] perf libunwind arm64: Fix missing close parens in an if statement Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-11 0:51 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_hndlFEnn5DHjvL@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox