From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBD091F95C; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 08:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744534530; cv=none; b=jfFsEnzKuuM1yehVK9GAimNbaahWwkvoNi9L2jLwIX9Ua+/6zzS3YvwT7QtB5a/cCE991nNmtZxEtJ2s95VoHEHZ8kwS40vJ6liMWl/K5w2IPu0PwUXII6F3GQb7WphngXcEKiWi3I24fJ9XXQyu/Q0AtOlslAmfDalnj46oziw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744534530; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1TqjYUc3KglV6+3Br7EdMouyO18ud70iYMOgRZYKvTM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fl4ThapMcThv5HmtBSaSpLYiPeF0fEl2ua+aB2OlJYkU6LNBj4Iw4PXOYBuoq3oQDPj4LqWiFkh6vf20KELWhX2laH3slqonX+Q/VB3NbViqo+jfnu1Ct4XWUb51Ln0Q/gCcGhVGJSr/4ag3XtgMZDgLGGkGx/CASb8dMzExcYI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nYT6jFR+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nYT6jFR+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED6B2C4CEDD; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744534530; bh=1TqjYUc3KglV6+3Br7EdMouyO18ud70iYMOgRZYKvTM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nYT6jFR+RLTv8FZgWeJx+hG0pNm+NxVio9dYDl7Ws6zso7+9NBq7Pgz8aMc52x++D AK74u756QRmyIdSqarBeQqspRbLe4Ss8OUzodPEKE9xBuXZcDstMJqpdHKWjm53qKP 3q4FceDWKb1zsZO7XKDDW7ETjJlz6iNII0qcBrVMV/2W0gZCUMR7MO1Q37w+c24F2n liRf6qfwuJycWOMgjj8Re4/sg8A7eMPYMGNqGgDRXYwpxDYHpg2awEBSatDtsWT1H1 DeM3IjZuHBPV60o7qLPcGEeWtmUehdDaJkf5uIqAvnMAHCNqaJyJjSa61fpqH58Oh4 hESCt2h7M0H/Q== Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 10:55:25 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Uros Bizjak Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Paul Menzel , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: core/urgent] compiler.h: Avoid the usage of __typeof_unqual__() when __GENKSYMS__ is defined Message-ID: References: <20250404102535.705090-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> <174428272631.31282.1484467383146370221.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20250411210815.GAZ_mEv8riLWzvERYY@renoirsky.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: * Uros Bizjak wrote: > > Yeah, agreed, I've removed this workaround from tip:core/urgent for > > the time being - it's not like genksyms is some magic external > > entity we have to work around, it's an in-kernel tool that can be > > fixed/enhanced in scripts/genksyms/. > > Please note that you will disable a check that is finally able to > fail the build for a whole class of very subtle percpu bugs. I simply zapped a commit that was applied two days ago and asked akpm to resolve a regression that was introduced upstream via his tree through this commit, in this merge window: ac053946f5c4 ("compiler.h: introduce TYPEOF_UNQUAL() macro") What 'disabled checks' are you talking about? Thanks, Ingo