From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9030D86344; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 19:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744572006; cv=none; b=VXLpB83jE6PJon380ReJEXwTWsNkH1kk/ocNT3/6KrWUVBVHKr/lpYBjPAKGD4CgmbyS00CXInaoUrtBnS/rfoban2ffwDiF0Y8tuSfqtYsLjCpF4xhI6UuGjr6JezAgRP8ZZ8UFJlK+SItEYeVc0IGYV3M0hbyq0FifPJGQZIk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744572006; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jwJAf2mhzNRJa3GFdl49MLmGH40uEoMN3VP91CyQDk8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qVhHKqxNVe2Wtpd50fsLugxuzg2ylGHaqsmyYi6N/0avZ+xYW8jM9NuQUhkaa/bhae0Nyp67FQxjOEz5qcENbwdKKs8VrdtLAG8jyXziJz+/oK7IaxCzJz+LLYlHOvrxz31BHViFdqlQn51bmHwe2JgL/B7qEZwbaiEGNToQJqU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Nz5CfqDG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Nz5CfqDG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B150AC4CEDD; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 19:20:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744572005; bh=jwJAf2mhzNRJa3GFdl49MLmGH40uEoMN3VP91CyQDk8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Nz5CfqDGIuVkHMUr2U0MKaFc/kgKzAHDcrM/iqsMkfwk4J4PwQHXJqTSgHizG2rxa xyUeB8hQFhGhX3aJb0xaj+hLM0ll9Ph845ZTsmT6Y9tyJv/s0pQKK9dosjZsOWYWAm kkYDLZcutJ4zo+21sv3WVe7QZOPHMimwDDdLFD7fFDkCFGnvqew+9r+rIqK3Rlwrpw P8tPu8K+ky14LvhZbA7hnclOj4FXVeidhr3Nefg0lQkt4msaIp7Fzmew9e0R5cMtMH epkli/AsOscspr65I7xmoCX4AKxWaEW26gqxpi0nKwE3VY5LktDzY7Y8TZM3Q6I3Yq 1WNVBuHv2Rhyw== Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:20:00 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Uros Bizjak Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Paul Menzel , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: core/urgent] compiler.h: Avoid the usage of __typeof_unqual__() when __GENKSYMS__ is defined Message-ID: References: <20250404102535.705090-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> <174428272631.31282.1484467383146370221.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20250411210815.GAZ_mEv8riLWzvERYY@renoirsky.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: * Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > If this commit is removed, [...] > > > > I did not remove commit ac053946f5c4, it's already upstream. Nor > > did I advocate for it to be reverted - I'd like it to be fixed. So > > you are barking up the wrong tree. > > If the intention is to pass my proposed workaround via Andrew's tree, > then I'm happy to bark up the wrong tree, but from the referred > message trail, I didn't get the clear decision about the patch, and > neither am sure which patch "brown paper bag bug" refers to. It's up to akpm (he merged your original patch that regressed), but I think scripts/genksyms/ should be fixed instead of worked around - which is why I zapped the workaround. Thanks, Ingo