public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: dwc: Cleanup in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq()
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:24:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Za7O7mfuQH7GxWVQ@x1-carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5499db2-2c25-4765-b9e0-1fa26da1cc45@moroto.mountain>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:21:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I recently changed the code in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() to use
> ALIGN_DOWN(). The code in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() is similar so
> update it to match as well.  (No effect on runtime, just a cleanup).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: Add this patch
> v3: Use ALIGN_DOWN() as a style improvement
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 51679c6702cf..1c8d2e938851 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>  		msg_data = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
>  	}
>  	aligned_offset = msg_addr_lower & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
> -	msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 |
> -			(msg_addr_lower & ~aligned_offset);
> +	msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower;
> +	msg_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);
>  	ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, 0, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
>  				  epc->mem->window.page_size);
>  	if (ret)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>


Although, if I'm being super nitpicky
(sorry... and feel free to ignore),
I think this is slightly cleaner:

--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -482,9 +482,10 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
                reg = ep_func->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_DATA_32;
                msg_data = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
        }
-       aligned_offset = msg_addr_lower & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
-       msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 |
-                       (msg_addr_lower & ~aligned_offset);
+       msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower;
+
+       aligned_offset = msg_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
+       msg_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);
        ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, 0, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
                                  epc->mem->window.page_size);
        if (ret)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22 15:19 [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() Dan Carpenter
2024-01-22 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: dwc: Cleanup in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() Dan Carpenter
2024-01-22 20:24   ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-01-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() Niklas Cassel
2024-01-22 20:29 ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Za7O7mfuQH7GxWVQ@x1-carbon \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox