public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
Cc: "jiangshanlai@gmail.com" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-team@meta.com" <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:49:21 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaCMkV_pjPfhZmrn@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3r47rru6go5fqxl5issvduzzmsxrtkefigrkfcnqiuouxm467@72hfzpblzr36>

Hello,

On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 02:44:08AM +0000, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> Thank you for the series. I applied the patches on btrfs's development tree
> below, and ran the benchmark.
> 
> https://gitlab.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git misc-next
> 
> - misc-next, numa=off (baseline)
>   WRITE: bw=1117MiB/s (1171MB/s), 1117MiB/s-1117MiB/s (1171MB/s-1171MB/s), io=332GiB (356GB), run=304322-304322msec
> - misc-next + wq patches, numa=off
>   WRITE: bw=1866MiB/s (1957MB/s), 1866MiB/s-1866MiB/s (1957MB/s-1957MB/s), io=684GiB (735GB), run=375472-375472msec
> 
> So, the patches surely improved the performance. However, as show below, it
> is still lower than reverting previous workqueue patches. The reverting is
> done by reverse applying output of "git diff 4cbfd3de737b
> kernel/workqueue.c kernel/workqueue_internal.h include/linux/workqueue*
> init/main.c"
> 
> - misc-next + wq reverted, numa=off
>   WRITE: bw=2472MiB/s (2592MB/s), 2472MiB/s-2472MiB/s (2592MB/s-2592MB/s), io=732GiB (786GB), run=303257-303257msec

Can you describe the test setup in detail? What kind of machine is it? What
do you mean by `numa=off`? Can you report tools/workqueue/wq_dump.py output?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-12  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20  7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:13   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:05     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 21:36       ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:06     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:12     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Reimplement ordered workqueue using shared nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:18   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  9:20 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-21 23:01   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-22  8:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-22  9:08       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-05  2:44 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-12  0:49   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-01-13  0:17     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-15  5:46     ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-16 21:04       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30  2:24         ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-30 16:11           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZaCMkV_pjPfhZmrn@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox