[PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.207-rc1

Alexander Atanasov <alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com>
    scsi: core: Always send batch on reset or error handling command

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "scsi: core: Add scsi_prot_ref_tag() helper"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "scsi: core: Introduce scsi_get_sector()"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "scsi: core: Make scsi_get_lba() return the LBA"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "scsi: core: Use scsi_cmd_to_rq() instead of scsi_cmnd.request"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "scsi: core: Use a structure member to track the SCSI command submitter"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "scsi: core: Always send batch on reset or error handling command"


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                    |  4 ++--
 drivers/scsi/scsi.c         |  2 +-
 drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c   | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c     | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
 drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h    |  1 -
 include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h    | 29 +++--------------------------
 include/scsi/scsi_device.h  | 16 +++++++---------
 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 660 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 1/11/24 01:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Slade Watkins]

> On Jan 11, 2024, at 4:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Hi,
5.10.207-rc1 compiled and booted just fine on x86_64, no errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net <mailto:srw@sladewatkins.net>>

Best,
Slade

Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Dominique Martinet]

Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:52:49AM +0100:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Tested 9d64f2ec9cf9 ("Linux 5.10.207-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)

No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>

-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus

Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.207-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 9d64f2ec9cf9d1a55dabce3c7f639ec26bd1d7b4
* git describe: v5.10.206-8-g9d64f2ec9cf9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.206-8-g9d64f2ec9cf9

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)

## Test result summary
total: 99306, pass: 75376, fail: 4061, skip: 19792, xfail: 77

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 117 total, 117 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/7] 5.10.207-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:52:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    68 tests:	68 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.207-rc1-g9d64f2ec9cf9
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon