From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Valentin.Schneider@arm.com,
Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>,
Matteo Carlini <Matteo.Carlini@arm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:28:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaZMTn62DI+2ygyb@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f84f3e60-e71a-4ea4-8c9c-86fd915129a9@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 03:10:26PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> On 2024/1/15 23:39, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:05:56PM -0800, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> > > Index: linux/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > +++ linux/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1407,7 +1407,21 @@ config SCHED_SMT
> > > config NR_CPUS
> > > int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-4096)"
> > > range 2 4096
> >
> > I think your mailer got to your patch and messed up the white space.
> > There are two spaces before each of these lines rather than the usual
> > one.
> >
> > > - default "256"
> > > + default 512
> > > +
> > > +#
> > > +# Determines the placement of cpumasks.
> > > +#
> > > +# With CPUMASK_OFFSTACK the cpumasks are dynamically allocated.
> > > +# Useful for machines with lots of core because it avoids increasing
> > > +# the size of many of the data structures in the kernel.
> > > +#
> > > +# If this is off then the cpumasks have a static sizes and are
> > > +# embedded within data structures.
> > > +#
> > > +config CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> > > + def_bool y
> > > + depends on NR_CPUS > 256
> >
> > Should that be ">= 256" ?
>
> Maybe just select CPUMASK_OFFSTACK if NR_CPUS >= 256,
>
>
> But could we just make CPUMASK_OFFSTACK configurable and let user/distro
> to enable it?
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
> index 5ddda7c2ed9b..4254be5aa843 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig
> @@ -535,7 +535,9 @@ config CHECK_SIGNATURE
> bool
>
> config CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> - bool "Force CPU masks off stack" if DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> + bool "Force CPU masks off stack"
> + depends on SMP
> + default n
Please. No.
There is no point in defining a default of n. The default default is n.
Therefore, specifying a default of n is utterly redundant as the option
will still default to n and just adds clutter to Kconfig files.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-15 0:05 [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512 Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-15 15:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-16 7:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-01-16 9:28 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-01-16 13:08 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-16 21:06 ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-17 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-15 23:59 ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-16 11:24 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-16 21:06 ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-17 20:01 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-18 17:53 ` Eric Mackay
2024-01-23 23:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaZMTn62DI+2ygyb@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Matteo.Carlini@arm.com \
--cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).