From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: fix potential premature unload in bpf_testmod
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:58:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaajJVrGLakTmtH1@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240110085737.8895-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 09:57:37AM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> It is possible for bpf_kfunc_call_test_release() to be called from
> bpf_map_free_deferred() when bpf_testmod is already unloaded and
> perf_test_stuct.cnt which it tries to decrease is no longer in memory.
> This patch tries to fix the issue by waiting for all references to be
> dropped in bpf_testmod_exit().
>
> The issue can be triggered by running 'test_progs -t map_kptr' in 6.5,
> but is obscured in 6.6 by d119357d07435 ("rcu-tasks: Treat only
> synchronous grace periods urgently").
>
> Fixes: 65eb006d85a2a ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod")
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
jirka
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> index 91907b321f913..e7c9e1c7fde04 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
> #include <linux/btf.h>
> #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/error-injection.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -544,6 +545,14 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
>
> static void bpf_testmod_exit(void)
> {
> + /* Need to wait for all references to be dropped because
> + * bpf_kfunc_call_test_release() which currently resides in kernel can
> + * be called after bpf_testmod is unloaded. Once release function is
> + * moved into the module this wait can be removed.
> + */
> + while (refcount_read(&prog_test_struct.cnt) > 1)
> + msleep(20);
> +
> return sysfs_remove_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-09 16:43 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix potential premature unload in bpf_testmod Artem Savkov
2024-01-09 19:40 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-10 8:14 ` Artem Savkov
2024-01-10 12:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-01-10 8:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] " Artem Savkov
2024-01-16 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-01-16 16:58 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaajJVrGLakTmtH1@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox