From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:13:10 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbBWFvZpLl5fAAEz@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJhGHyCc4trDp7XQixt0EmTnwd-2fdH2hn4fH=wKRB216MQssg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:55:49PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Hello, Tejun
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 8:29 AM Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > @@ -327,6 +337,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
> > /* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
> > unsigned int flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
> > struct pool_workqueue __percpu __rcu **cpu_pwq; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
> > + struct wq_node_nr_active **node_nr_active; /* I: per-node nr_active */
>
> flexible array can be used here.
Yeah, will do that.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-13 0:28 [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 1/9] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 2/9] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 3/9] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 4/9] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 5/9] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 6/9] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 7/9] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 8/9] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-19 7:55 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-24 0:13 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-01-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 9/9] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-01-19 7:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-24 0:30 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-24 2:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-25 16:18 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbBWFvZpLl5fAAEz@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox