From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:23:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbBYgmBZ/1BRPi3S@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84790a56-1c7c-4ddb-a4da-17dc84c1f670@roeck-us.net>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 03:22:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/23/24 13:58, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > The ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests did not have the data
> > types properly casted, and improperly misaligned data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Add additional patch to fix alignment issues
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119-fix_sparse_errors_checksum_tests-v1-1-2d3df86d8d78@rivosinc.com
> >
>
> I applied both patches but see the following.
>
> KTAP version 1
> # Subtest: checksum
> # module: checksum_kunit
> 1..5
> ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
> ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
> ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs
> # test_ip_fast_csum: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:541
> Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
> ( u64)csum_result == 27015 (0x6987)
> ( u64)expected == 55912 (0xda68)
> not ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
> # test_csum_ipv6_magic: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:564
> Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
> ( u64)csum_result == 42151 (0xa4a7)
> ( u64)expected == 5513 (0x1589)
> not ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
> # checksum: pass:3 fail:2 skip:0 total:5
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:2 skip:0 total:5
> not ok 17 checksum
>
> Old result, before applying the patches (v6.8-rc1):
>
> KTAP version 1
> # Subtest: checksum
> # module: checksum_kunit
> 1..5
> ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
> ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
> ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs
> ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
> ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
> # checksum: pass:5 fail:0 skip:0 total:5
> # Totals: pass:5 fail:0 skip:0 total:5
> ok 17 checksum
>
> This is with the imx25-pdk emulation in qemu.
>
> Guenter
Apologies for that, some garbage values snuck in. I'll send a new
version.
- Charlie
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 21:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-23 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] lib: checksum: Fix type casting in checksum kunits Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-23 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests Guenter Roeck
2024-01-24 0:23 ` Charlie Jenkins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbBYgmBZ/1BRPi3S@ghost \
--to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox