[PATCH 0/8] RCU exp updates for v6.9

[PATCH 0/8] RCU exp updates for v6.9

[Boqun Feng]

Hi,

This series contains the updates and fixes of RCU expedited for v6.9.
You can also find the series at:

	https://github.com/fbq/linux.git rcu-exp.2024.01.29a

The detailed list of the changes:

Frederic Weisbecker (8):
  rcu/exp: Remove full barrier upon main thread wakeup
  rcu/exp: Fix RCU expedited parallel grace period kworker allocation
    failure recovery
  rcu/exp: Handle RCU expedited grace period kworker allocation failure
  rcu: s/boost_kthread_mutex/kthread_mutex
  rcu/exp: Move expedited kthread worker creation functions above
    rcutree_prepare_cpu()
  rcu/exp: Make parallel exp gp kworker per rcu node
  rcu/exp: Handle parallel exp gp kworkers affinity
  rcu/exp: Remove rcu_par_gp_wq

 kernel/rcu/rcu.h         |   5 --
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  11 ++-
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h    |  83 +++----------------
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h |  52 ++----------
 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 1/8] rcu/exp: Remove full barrier upon main thread wakeup

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

When an expedited grace period is ending, care must be taken so that all
the quiescent states propagated up to the root are correctly ordered
against the wake up of the main expedited grace period workqueue.

This ordering is already carried through the root rnp locking augmented
by an smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() barrier.

Therefore the explicit smp_mb() placed before the wake up is not needed
and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 2ac440bc7e10..014ddf672165 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -198,10 +198,9 @@ static void __rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp,
 		}
 		if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-			if (wake) {
-				smp_mb(); /* EGP done before wake_up(). */
+			if (wake)
 				swake_up_one_online(&rcu_state.expedited_wq);
-			}
+
 			break;
 		}
 		mask = rnp->grpmask;
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH 1/8] rcu/exp: Remove full barrier upon main thread wakeup

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Le Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:23:39PM -0800, Boqun Feng a écrit :
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> 
> When an expedited grace period is ending, care must be taken so that all
> the quiescent states propagated up to the root are correctly ordered
> against the wake up of the main expedited grace period workqueue.
> 
> This ordering is already carried through the root rnp locking augmented
> by an smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() barrier.
> 
> Therefore the explicit smp_mb() placed before the wake up is not needed
> and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

[Offlist]

For further posting, don't forget to add your own SoB while posting patches :-)

Thanks!

Re: [PATCH 1/8] rcu/exp: Remove full barrier upon main thread wakeup

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Le Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:47:16PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit :
> Le Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:23:39PM -0800, Boqun Feng a écrit :
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > 
> > When an expedited grace period is ending, care must be taken so that all
> > the quiescent states propagated up to the root are correctly ordered
> > against the wake up of the main expedited grace period workqueue.
> > 
> > This ordering is already carried through the root rnp locking augmented
> > by an smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() barrier.
> > 
> > Therefore the explicit smp_mb() placed before the wake up is not needed
> > and can be removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> 
> [Offlist]

And yes that was not offlist, my fingers betrayed me!

> 
> For further posting, don't forget to add your own SoB while posting patches :-)
> 
> Thanks!
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/8] rcu/exp: Remove full barrier upon main thread wakeup

[Boqun Feng]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:48:41PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:47:16PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit :
> > Le Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:23:39PM -0800, Boqun Feng a écrit :
> > > From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > When an expedited grace period is ending, care must be taken so that all
> > > the quiescent states propagated up to the root are correctly ordered
> > > against the wake up of the main expedited grace period workqueue.
> > > 
> > > This ordering is already carried through the root rnp locking augmented
> > > by an smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() barrier.
> > > 
> > > Therefore the explicit smp_mb() placed before the wake up is not needed
> > > and can be removed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > 
> > [Offlist]
> 
> And yes that was not offlist, my fingers betrayed me!
> 

Thanks for the reminder anyway ;-)

Regards,
Boqun

> > 
> > For further posting, don't forget to add your own SoB while posting patches :-)
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 

[PATCH 2/8] rcu/exp: Fix RCU expedited parallel grace period kworker allocation failure recovery

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Under CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=y, the nodes initialization for expedited
grace periods is queued to a kworker. However if the allocation of that
kworker failed, the nodes initialization is performed synchronously by
the caller instead.

Now the check for kworker initialization failure relies on the kworker
pointer to be NULL while its value might actually encapsulate an
allocation failure error.

Make sure to handle this case.

Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fixes: 9621fbee44df ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index b2bccfd37c38..38c86f2c040b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4749,6 +4749,7 @@ static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
 	rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, par_gp_kworker_name);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker)) {
 		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", par_gp_kworker_name);
+		rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		kthread_destroy_worker(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 3/8] rcu/exp: Handle RCU expedited grace period kworker allocation failure

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Just like is done for the kworker performing nodes initialization,
gracefully handle the possible allocation failure of the RCU expedited
grace period main kworker.

While at it perform a rename of the related checking functions to better
reflect the expedited specifics.

Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fixes: 9621fbee44df ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c     |  2 ++
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 38c86f2c040b..f2c10d351b59 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4743,6 +4743,7 @@ static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
 	rcu_exp_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, gp_kworker_name);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_gp_kworker)) {
 		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", gp_kworker_name);
+		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -4751,6 +4752,7 @@ static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
 		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", par_gp_kworker_name);
 		rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		kthread_destroy_worker(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
+		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		return;
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 014ddf672165..6123a60d9a4d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -427,7 +427,12 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct kthread_work *wp)
 	__sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(rewp);
 }
 
-static inline bool rcu_gp_par_worker_started(void)
+static inline bool rcu_exp_worker_started(void)
+{
+	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
+}
+
+static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(void)
 {
 	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker);
 }
@@ -477,7 +482,12 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct work_struct *wp)
 	__sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(rewp);
 }
 
-static inline bool rcu_gp_par_worker_started(void)
+static inline bool rcu_exp_worker_started(void)
+{
+	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_gp_wq);
+}
+
+static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(void)
 {
 	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_par_gp_wq);
 }
@@ -540,7 +550,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(void)
 		rnp->exp_need_flush = false;
 		if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask))
 			continue; /* Avoid early boot non-existent wq. */
-		if (!rcu_gp_par_worker_started() ||
+		if (!rcu_exp_par_worker_started() ||
 		    rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING ||
 		    rcu_is_last_leaf_node(rnp)) {
 			/* No worker started yet or last leaf, do direct call. */
@@ -955,7 +965,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
-	bool boottime = (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT);
+	bool use_worker;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_exp_work rew;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
@@ -966,6 +976,9 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 			 lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
 			 "Illegal synchronize_rcu_expedited() in RCU read-side critical section");
 
+	use_worker = (rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT) &&
+		      rcu_exp_worker_started();
+
 	/* Is the state is such that the call is a grace period? */
 	if (rcu_blocking_is_gp()) {
 		// Note well that this code runs with !PREEMPT && !SMP.
@@ -995,7 +1008,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 		return;  /* Someone else did our work for us. */
 
 	/* Ensure that load happens before action based on it. */
-	if (unlikely(boottime)) {
+	if (unlikely(!use_worker)) {
 		/* Direct call during scheduler init and early_initcalls(). */
 		rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(s);
 	} else {
@@ -1013,7 +1026,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 	/* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
 
-	if (likely(!boottime))
+	if (likely(use_worker))
 		synchronize_rcu_expedited_destroy_work(&rew);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 4/8] rcu: s/boost_kthread_mutex/kthread_mutex

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

This mutex is currently protecting per node boost kthreads creation and
affinity setting across CPU hotplug operations.

Since the expedited kworkers will soon be split per node as well, they
will be subject to the same concurrency constraints against hotplug.

Therefore their creation and affinity tuning operations will be grouped
with those of boost kthreads and then rely on the same mutex.

To prepare for that, generalize its name.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        |  2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f2c10d351b59..cdb80835c469 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4918,7 +4918,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(void)
 			init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->exp_wq[2]);
 			init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->exp_wq[3]);
 			spin_lock_init(&rnp->exp_lock);
-			mutex_init(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+			mutex_init(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 			raw_spin_lock_init(&rnp->exp_poll_lock);
 			rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq = RCU_GET_STATE_COMPLETED;
 			INIT_WORK(&rnp->exp_poll_wq, sync_rcu_do_polled_gp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index e9821a8422db..13e7b0d907ab 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct rcu_node {
 				/*  side effect, not as a lock. */
 	unsigned long boost_time;
 				/* When to start boosting (jiffies). */
-	struct mutex boost_kthread_mutex;
+	struct mutex kthread_mutex;
 				/* Exclusion for thread spawning and affinity */
 				/*  manipulation. */
 	struct task_struct *boost_kthread_task;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 41021080ad25..0d307674915c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	struct sched_param sp;
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
-	mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 	if (rnp->boost_kthread_task || !rcu_scheduler_fully_active)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	wake_up_process(t); /* get to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE quickly. */
 
  out:
-	mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  * no outgoing CPU.  If there are no CPUs left in the affinity set,
  * this function allows the kthread to execute on any CPU.
  *
- * Any future concurrent calls are serialized via ->boost_kthread_mutex.
+ * Any future concurrent calls are serialized via ->kthread_mutex.
  */
 static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
 {
@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
 		return;
 	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
 		return;
-	mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 	mask = rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp);
 	for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
 		if ((mask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) &&
@@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
 			cpumask_clear_cpu(outgoingcpu, cm);
 	}
 	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, cm);
-	mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 	free_cpumask_var(cm);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 5/8] rcu/exp: Move expedited kthread worker creation functions above rcutree_prepare_cpu()

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

The expedited kthread worker performing the per node initialization is
going to be split into per node kthreads. As such, the future per node
kthread creation will need to be called from CPU hotplug callbacks
instead of an initcall, right beside the per node boost kthread
creation.

To prepare for that, move the kthread worker creation above
rcutree_prepare_cpu() as a first step to make the review smoother for
the upcoming modifications.

No intended functional change.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index cdb80835c469..657ac12f9e27 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4394,6 +4394,54 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
 	rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
+struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
+struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker;
+
+static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
+{
+	const char *par_gp_kworker_name = "rcu_exp_par_gp_kthread_worker";
+	const char *gp_kworker_name = "rcu_exp_gp_kthread_worker";
+	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = kthread_prio };
+
+	rcu_exp_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, gp_kworker_name);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_gp_kworker)) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", gp_kworker_name);
+		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, par_gp_kworker_name);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker)) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", par_gp_kworker_name);
+		rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = NULL;
+		kthread_destroy_worker(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
+		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO,
+				   &param);
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
+{
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
+struct workqueue_struct *rcu_par_gp_wq;
+
+static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
+{
+	rcu_par_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_par_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	WARN_ON(!rcu_par_gp_wq);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
+
 /*
  * Invoked early in the CPU-online process, when pretty much all services
  * are available.  The incoming CPU is not present.
@@ -4730,54 +4778,6 @@ static int rcu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
-struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
-struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker;
-
-static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
-{
-	const char *par_gp_kworker_name = "rcu_exp_par_gp_kthread_worker";
-	const char *gp_kworker_name = "rcu_exp_gp_kthread_worker";
-	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = kthread_prio };
-
-	rcu_exp_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, gp_kworker_name);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_gp_kworker)) {
-		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", gp_kworker_name);
-		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, par_gp_kworker_name);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker)) {
-		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", par_gp_kworker_name);
-		rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = NULL;
-		kthread_destroy_worker(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
-		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
-	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO,
-				   &param);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
-{
-}
-#else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
-struct workqueue_struct *rcu_par_gp_wq;
-
-static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
-{
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
-{
-	rcu_par_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_par_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
-	WARN_ON(!rcu_par_gp_wq);
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
-
 /*
  * Spawn the kthreads that handle RCU's grace periods.
  */
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 6/8] rcu/exp: Make parallel exp gp kworker per rcu node

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

When CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=n, the expedited grace period per node
initialization is performed in parallel via workqueues (one work per
node).

However in CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=y, this per node initialization is
performed by a single kworker serializing each node initialization (one
work for all nodes).

The second part is certainly less scalable and efficient beyond a single
leaf node.

To improve this, expand this single kworker into per-node kworkers. This
new layout is eventually intended to remove the workqueues based
implementation since it will essentially now become duplicate code.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h         |  1 -
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  3 ++
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h    | 10 +++----
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 ++-----
 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index f94f65877f2b..6beaf70d629f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void);
 extern struct workqueue_struct *rcu_gp_wq;
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
 extern struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
-extern struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker;
 #else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
 extern struct workqueue_struct *rcu_par_gp_wq;
 #endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 657ac12f9e27..398c099d45d9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4396,33 +4396,39 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
 struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
-struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker;
 
-static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
+static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
-	const char *par_gp_kworker_name = "rcu_exp_par_gp_kthread_worker";
-	const char *gp_kworker_name = "rcu_exp_gp_kthread_worker";
+	struct kthread_worker *kworker;
+	const char *name = "rcu_exp_par_gp_kthread_worker/%d";
 	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = kthread_prio };
+	int rnp_index = rnp - rcu_get_root();
 
-	rcu_exp_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, gp_kworker_name);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_gp_kworker)) {
-		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", gp_kworker_name);
-		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
+	if (rnp->exp_kworker)
+		return;
+
+	kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, name, rnp_index);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(kworker)) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create par gp kworker on %d/%d\n",
+		       rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi);
 		return;
 	}
+	WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_kworker, kworker);
+	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+}
 
-	rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, par_gp_kworker_name);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker)) {
-		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", par_gp_kworker_name);
-		rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = NULL;
-		kthread_destroy_worker(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
+static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
+{
+	const char *name = "rcu_exp_gp_kthread_worker";
+	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = kthread_prio };
+
+	rcu_exp_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, name);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_gp_kworker)) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", name);
 		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		return;
 	}
-
 	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
-	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO,
-				   &param);
 }
 
 static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
@@ -4431,7 +4437,11 @@ static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
 #else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
 struct workqueue_struct *rcu_par_gp_wq;
 
-static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
+static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+}
+
+static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
 {
 }
 
@@ -4442,6 +4452,17 @@ static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
 
+static void rcu_spawn_rnp_kthreads(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD) ||
+	     IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST)) && rcu_scheduler_fully_active) {
+		mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
+		rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rnp);
+		rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(rnp);
+		mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Invoked early in the CPU-online process, when pretty much all services
  * are available.  The incoming CPU is not present.
@@ -4490,7 +4511,7 @@ int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	rdp->rcu_iw_gp_seq = rdp->gp_seq - 1;
 	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rdp->gp_seq, TPS("cpuonl"));
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-	rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rnp);
+	rcu_spawn_rnp_kthreads(rnp);
 	rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(cpu);
 	WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus + 1);
 
@@ -4812,10 +4833,10 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_gp_kthread(void)
 	 * due to rcu_scheduler_fully_active.
 	 */
 	rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(smp_processor_id());
-	rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rdp->mynode);
+	rcu_spawn_rnp_kthreads(rdp->mynode);
 	rcu_spawn_core_kthreads();
 	/* Create kthread worker for expedited GPs */
-	rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers();
+	rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker();
 	return 0;
 }
 early_initcall(rcu_spawn_gp_kthread);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 13e7b0d907ab..e173808f486f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ struct rcu_node {
 				/* Online CPUs for next expedited GP. */
 				/*  Any CPU that has ever been online will */
 				/*  have its bit set. */
+	struct kthread_worker *exp_kworker;
+				/* Workers performing per node expedited GP */
+				/* initialization. */
 	unsigned long cbovldmask;
 				/* CPUs experiencing callback overload. */
 	unsigned long ffmask;	/* Fully functional CPUs. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 6123a60d9a4d..0318a8a062d5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -432,9 +432,9 @@ static inline bool rcu_exp_worker_started(void)
 	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
 }
 
-static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(void)
+static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
-	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker);
+	return !!READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_kworker);
 }
 
 static inline void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus_queue_work(struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static inline void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus_queue_work(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	 * another work item on the same kthread worker can result in
 	 * deadlock.
 	 */
-	kthread_queue_work(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker, &rnp->rew.rew_work);
+	kthread_queue_work(READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_kworker), &rnp->rew.rew_work);
 }
 
 static inline void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus_flush_work(struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static inline bool rcu_exp_worker_started(void)
 	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_gp_wq);
 }
 
-static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(void)
+static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_par_gp_wq);
 }
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(void)
 		rnp->exp_need_flush = false;
 		if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask))
 			continue; /* Avoid early boot non-existent wq. */
-		if (!rcu_exp_par_worker_started() ||
+		if (!rcu_exp_par_worker_started(rnp) ||
 		    rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING ||
 		    rcu_is_last_leaf_node(rnp)) {
 			/* No worker started yet or last leaf, do direct call. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 0d307674915c..09bdd36ca9ff 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1195,14 +1195,13 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	struct sched_param sp;
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
-	mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
-	if (rnp->boost_kthread_task || !rcu_scheduler_fully_active)
-		goto out;
+	if (rnp->boost_kthread_task)
+		return;
 
 	t = kthread_create(rcu_boost_kthread, (void *)rnp,
 			   "rcub/%d", rnp_index);
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(t)))
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	rnp->boost_kthread_task = t;
@@ -1210,9 +1209,6 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	sp.sched_priority = kthread_prio;
 	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
 	wake_up_process(t); /* get to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE quickly. */
-
- out:
-	mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 7/8] rcu/exp: Handle parallel exp gp kworkers affinity

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Affine the parallel expedited gp kworkers to their respective RCU node
in order to make them close to the cache their are playing with.

This reuses the boost kthreads machinery that probe into CPU hotplug
operations such that the kthreads become/stay affine to their respective
node as soon/long as they contain online CPUs. Otherwise and if the
current CPU going down was the last online on the leaf node, the related
kthread is affine to the housekeeping CPUs.

In the long run, this affinity VS CPU hotplug operation game should
probably be implemented at the generic kthread level.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[boqun: s/* rcu_boost_task/*rcu_boost_task as reported by checkpatch]
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 42 ++-------------------
 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 398c099d45d9..312c4c5d4509 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int rcu_scheduler_fully_active __read_mostly;
 
 static void rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 			      unsigned long gps, unsigned long flags);
-static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu);
+static struct task_struct *rcu_boost_task(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 static void invoke_rcu_core(void);
 static void rcu_report_exp_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp);
 static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu);
@@ -4417,6 +4417,16 @@ static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 }
 
+static struct task_struct *rcu_exp_par_gp_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	struct kthread_worker *kworker = READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_kworker);
+
+	if (!kworker)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return kworker->task;
+}
+
 static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
 {
 	const char *name = "rcu_exp_gp_kthread_worker";
@@ -4441,6 +4451,11 @@ static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 }
 
+static struct task_struct *rcu_exp_par_gp_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
 {
 }
@@ -4519,13 +4534,67 @@ int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 }
 
 /*
- * Update RCU priority boot kthread affinity for CPU-hotplug changes.
+ * Update kthreads affinity during CPU-hotplug changes.
+ *
+ * Set the per-rcu_node kthread's affinity to cover all CPUs that are
+ * served by the rcu_node in question.  The CPU hotplug lock is still
+ * held, so the value of rnp->qsmaskinit will be stable.
+ *
+ * We don't include outgoingcpu in the affinity set, use -1 if there is
+ * no outgoing CPU.  If there are no CPUs left in the affinity set,
+ * this function allows the kthread to execute on any CPU.
+ *
+ * Any future concurrent calls are serialized via ->kthread_mutex.
  */
-static void rcutree_affinity_setting(unsigned int cpu, int outgoing)
+static void rcutree_affinity_setting(unsigned int cpu, int outgoingcpu)
 {
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+	cpumask_var_t cm;
+	unsigned long mask;
+	struct rcu_data *rdp;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp;
+	struct task_struct *task_boost, *task_exp;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST))
+		return;
+
+	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+	rnp = rdp->mynode;
+
+	task_boost = rcu_boost_task(rnp);
+	task_exp = rcu_exp_par_gp_task(rnp);
+
+	/*
+	 * If CPU is the boot one, those tasks are created later from early
+	 * initcall since kthreadd must be created first.
+	 */
+	if (!task_boost && !task_exp)
+		return;
+
+	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
+		return;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
+	mask = rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp);
+	for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
+		if ((mask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) &&
+		    cpu != outgoingcpu)
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cm);
+	cpumask_and(cm, cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
+	if (cpumask_empty(cm)) {
+		cpumask_copy(cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
+		if (outgoingcpu >= 0)
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(outgoingcpu, cm);
+	}
+
+	if (task_exp)
+		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task_exp, cm);
+
+	if (task_boost)
+		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task_boost, cm);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 
-	rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rdp->mynode, outgoing);
+	free_cpumask_var(cm);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 09bdd36ca9ff..36a8b5dbf5b5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1211,43 +1211,9 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	wake_up_process(t); /* get to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE quickly. */
 }
 
-/*
- * Set the per-rcu_node kthread's affinity to cover all CPUs that are
- * served by the rcu_node in question.  The CPU hotplug lock is still
- * held, so the value of rnp->qsmaskinit will be stable.
- *
- * We don't include outgoingcpu in the affinity set, use -1 if there is
- * no outgoing CPU.  If there are no CPUs left in the affinity set,
- * this function allows the kthread to execute on any CPU.
- *
- * Any future concurrent calls are serialized via ->kthread_mutex.
- */
-static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
+static struct task_struct *rcu_boost_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
-	struct task_struct *t = rnp->boost_kthread_task;
-	unsigned long mask;
-	cpumask_var_t cm;
-	int cpu;
-
-	if (!t)
-		return;
-	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
-		return;
-	mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
-	mask = rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp);
-	for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
-		if ((mask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) &&
-		    cpu != outgoingcpu)
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cm);
-	cpumask_and(cm, cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
-	if (cpumask_empty(cm)) {
-		cpumask_copy(cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
-		if (outgoingcpu >= 0)
-			cpumask_clear_cpu(outgoingcpu, cm);
-	}
-	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, cm);
-	mutex_unlock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
-	free_cpumask_var(cm);
+	return READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_kthread_task);
 }
 
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
@@ -1266,10 +1232,10 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 }
 
-static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
+static struct task_struct *rcu_boost_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
+	return NULL;
 }
-
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
 
 /*
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 8/8] rcu/exp: Remove rcu_par_gp_wq

[Boqun Feng]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

TREE04 running on short iterations can produce writer stalls of the
following kind:

 ??? Writer stall state RTWS_EXP_SYNC(4) g3968 f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 0
 task:rcu_torture_wri state:D stack:14568 pid:83    ppid:2      flags:0x00004000
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  __schedule+0x2de/0x850
  ? trace_event_raw_event_rcu_exp_funnel_lock+0x6d/0xb0
  schedule+0x4f/0x90
  synchronize_rcu_expedited+0x430/0x670
  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_synchronize_rcu_expedited+0x10/0x10
  do_rtws_sync.constprop.0+0xde/0x230
  rcu_torture_writer+0x4b4/0xcd0
  ? __pfx_rcu_torture_writer+0x10/0x10
  kthread+0xc7/0xf0
  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
  ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
  </TASK>

Waiting for an expedited grace period and polling for an expedited
grace period both are operations that internally rely on the same
workqueue performing necessary asynchronous work.

However, a dependency chain is involved between those two operations,
as depicted below:

       ====== CPU 0 =======                          ====== CPU 1 =======

                                                     synchronize_rcu_expedited()
                                                         exp_funnel_lock()
                                                             mutex_lock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
    start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited
        queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rnp->exp_poll_wq);
                                                         synchronize_rcu_expedited_queue_work()
                                                             queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rew->rew_work);
                                                         wait_event() // A, wait for &rew->rew_work completion
                                                         mutex_unlock() // B
    //======> switch to kworker

    sync_rcu_do_polled_gp() {
        synchronize_rcu_expedited()
            exp_funnel_lock()
                mutex_lock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex); // C, wait B
                ....
    } // D

Since workqueues are usually implemented on top of several kworkers
handling the queue concurrently, the above situation wouldn't deadlock
most of the time because A then doesn't depend on D. But in case of
memory stress, a single kworker may end up handling alone all the works
in a serialized way. In that case the above layout becomes a problem
because A then waits for D, closing a circular dependency:

	A -> D -> C -> B -> A

This however only happens when CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=n. Indeed
synchronize_rcu_expedited() is otherwise implemented on top of a kthread
worker while polling still relies on rcu_gp_wq workqueue, breaking the
above circular dependency chain.

Fix this with making expedited grace period to always rely on kthread
worker. The workqueue based implementation is essentially a duplicate
anyway now that the per-node initialization is performed by per-node
kthread workers.

Meanwhile the CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD switch is still kept around to
manage the scheduler policy of these kthread workers.

Reported-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h      |  4 ---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c     | 40 ++++--------------------
 kernel/rcu/tree.h     |  6 +---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 73 +------------------------------------------
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index 6beaf70d629f..99032b9cb667 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -623,11 +623,7 @@ int rcu_get_gp_kthreads_prio(void);
 void rcu_fwd_progress_check(unsigned long j);
 void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void);
 extern struct workqueue_struct *rcu_gp_wq;
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
 extern struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
-#else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
-extern struct workqueue_struct *rcu_par_gp_wq;
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
 void rcu_gp_slow_register(atomic_t *rgssp);
 void rcu_gp_slow_unregister(atomic_t *rgssp);
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 312c4c5d4509..9591c22408a1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4394,7 +4394,6 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
 	rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
 struct kthread_worker *rcu_exp_gp_kworker;
 
 static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -4414,7 +4413,9 @@ static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 		return;
 	}
 	WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_kworker, kworker);
-	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD))
+		sched_setscheduler_nocheck(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 }
 
 static struct task_struct *rcu_exp_par_gp_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -4438,39 +4439,14 @@ static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
 		rcu_exp_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		return;
 	}
-	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
-{
-}
-#else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
-struct workqueue_struct *rcu_par_gp_wq;
-
-static void rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-}
-
-static struct task_struct *rcu_exp_par_gp_task(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	return NULL;
-}
-
-static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworker(void)
-{
-}
 
-static inline void rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq(void)
-{
-	rcu_par_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_par_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
-	WARN_ON(!rcu_par_gp_wq);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD))
+		sched_setscheduler_nocheck(rcu_exp_gp_kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
 
 static void rcu_spawn_rnp_kthreads(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
-	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD) ||
-	     IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST)) && rcu_scheduler_fully_active) {
+	if (rcu_scheduler_fully_active) {
 		mutex_lock(&rnp->kthread_mutex);
 		rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rnp);
 		rcu_spawn_exp_par_gp_kworker(rnp);
@@ -4554,9 +4530,6 @@ static void rcutree_affinity_setting(unsigned int cpu, int outgoingcpu)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	struct task_struct *task_boost, *task_exp;
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST))
-		return;
-
 	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 	rnp = rdp->mynode;
 
@@ -5245,7 +5218,6 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 	/* Create workqueue for Tree SRCU and for expedited GPs. */
 	rcu_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
 	WARN_ON(!rcu_gp_wq);
-	rcu_alloc_par_gp_wq();
 
 	/* Fill in default value for rcutree.qovld boot parameter. */
 	/* -After- the rcu_node ->lock fields are initialized! */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index e173808f486f..f35e47f24d80 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -21,14 +21,10 @@
 
 #include "rcu_segcblist.h"
 
-/* Communicate arguments to a workqueue handler. */
+/* Communicate arguments to a kthread worker handler. */
 struct rcu_exp_work {
 	unsigned long rew_s;
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
 	struct kthread_work rew_work;
-#else
-	struct work_struct rew_work;
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
 };
 
 /* RCU's kthread states for tracing. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 0318a8a062d5..6b83537480b1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ static void __sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct rcu_exp_work *rewp)
 
 static void rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(unsigned long s);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD
 static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct kthread_work *wp)
 {
 	struct rcu_exp_work *rewp =
@@ -470,69 +469,6 @@ static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited_queue_work(struct rcu_exp_work *rew
 	kthread_queue_work(rcu_exp_gp_kworker, &rew->rew_work);
 }
 
-static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited_destroy_work(struct rcu_exp_work *rew)
-{
-}
-#else /* !CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
-static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct work_struct *wp)
-{
-	struct rcu_exp_work *rewp =
-		container_of(wp, struct rcu_exp_work, rew_work);
-
-	__sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(rewp);
-}
-
-static inline bool rcu_exp_worker_started(void)
-{
-	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_gp_wq);
-}
-
-static inline bool rcu_exp_par_worker_started(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	return !!READ_ONCE(rcu_par_gp_wq);
-}
-
-static inline void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus_queue_work(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	int cpu = find_next_bit(&rnp->ffmask, BITS_PER_LONG, -1);
-
-	INIT_WORK(&rnp->rew.rew_work, sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus);
-	/* If all offline, queue the work on an unbound CPU. */
-	if (unlikely(cpu > rnp->grphi - rnp->grplo))
-		cpu = WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
-	else
-		cpu += rnp->grplo;
-	queue_work_on(cpu, rcu_par_gp_wq, &rnp->rew.rew_work);
-}
-
-static inline void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus_flush_work(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	flush_work(&rnp->rew.rew_work);
-}
-
-/*
- * Work-queue handler to drive an expedited grace period forward.
- */
-static void wait_rcu_exp_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
-{
-	struct rcu_exp_work *rewp;
-
-	rewp = container_of(wp, struct rcu_exp_work, rew_work);
-	rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(rewp->rew_s);
-}
-
-static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited_queue_work(struct rcu_exp_work *rew)
-{
-	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&rew->rew_work, wait_rcu_exp_gp);
-	queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rew->rew_work);
-}
-
-static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited_destroy_work(struct rcu_exp_work *rew)
-{
-	destroy_work_on_stack(&rew->rew_work);
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD */
-
 /*
  * Select the nodes that the upcoming expedited grace period needs
  * to wait for.
@@ -965,7 +901,6 @@ static void rcu_exp_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
-	bool use_worker;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_exp_work rew;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
@@ -976,9 +911,6 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 			 lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
 			 "Illegal synchronize_rcu_expedited() in RCU read-side critical section");
 
-	use_worker = (rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT) &&
-		      rcu_exp_worker_started();
-
 	/* Is the state is such that the call is a grace period? */
 	if (rcu_blocking_is_gp()) {
 		// Note well that this code runs with !PREEMPT && !SMP.
@@ -1008,7 +940,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 		return;  /* Someone else did our work for us. */
 
 	/* Ensure that load happens before action based on it. */
-	if (unlikely(!use_worker)) {
+	if (unlikely((rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT) || !rcu_exp_worker_started())) {
 		/* Direct call during scheduler init and early_initcalls(). */
 		rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(s);
 	} else {
@@ -1025,9 +957,6 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 
 	/* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
-
-	if (likely(use_worker))
-		synchronize_rcu_expedited_destroy_work(&rew);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
 
-- 
2.43.0