From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH wq/for-6.9] workqueue: Fix queue_work_on() with BH workqueues
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:39:09 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc0IzeM6tAvm1NTl@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
From 2f34d7337d98f3eae7bd3d1270efaf9d8a17cfc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:33:55 -1000
When queue_work_on() is used to queue a BH work item on a remote CPU, the
work item is queued on that CPU but kick_pool() raises softirq on the local
CPU. This leads to stalls as the work item won't be executed until something
else on the remote CPU schedules a BH work item or tasklet locally.
Fix it by bouncing raising softirq to the target CPU using per-cpu irq_work.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 4cb1ef64609f ("workqueue: Implement BH workqueues to eventually replace tasklets")
---
Oops, I just found out that I was raising softirq on the wrong CPU when BH
work items are queued on remote CPUs. This fixes it. Applied to wq/for-6.9.
Thanks.
kernel/workqueue.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 4950bfc2cdcc..04e35dbe6799 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
#include <linux/nmi.h>
#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
#include "workqueue_internal.h"
@@ -457,6 +458,10 @@ static bool wq_debug_force_rr_cpu = false;
#endif
module_param_named(debug_force_rr_cpu, wq_debug_force_rr_cpu, bool, 0644);
+/* to raise softirq for the BH worker pools on other CPUs */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct irq_work [NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS],
+ bh_pool_irq_works);
+
/* the BH worker pools */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct worker_pool [NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS],
bh_worker_pools);
@@ -1197,6 +1202,13 @@ static bool assign_work(struct work_struct *work, struct worker *worker,
return true;
}
+static struct irq_work *bh_pool_irq_work(struct worker_pool *pool)
+{
+ int high = pool->attrs->nice == HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL ? 1 : 0;
+
+ return &per_cpu(bh_pool_irq_works, pool->cpu)[high];
+}
+
/**
* kick_pool - wake up an idle worker if necessary
* @pool: pool to kick
@@ -1215,10 +1227,15 @@ static bool kick_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
return false;
if (pool->flags & POOL_BH) {
- if (pool->attrs->nice == HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL)
- raise_softirq_irqoff(HI_SOFTIRQ);
- else
- raise_softirq_irqoff(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
+ if (likely(pool->cpu == smp_processor_id())) {
+ if (pool->attrs->nice == HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL)
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(HI_SOFTIRQ);
+ else
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
+ } else {
+ irq_work_queue_on(bh_pool_irq_work(pool), pool->cpu);
+ }
+
return true;
}
@@ -7367,6 +7384,16 @@ static inline void wq_watchdog_init(void) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_WQ_WATCHDOG */
+static void bh_pool_kick_normal(struct irq_work *irq_work)
+{
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
+}
+
+static void bh_pool_kick_highpri(struct irq_work *irq_work)
+{
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(HI_SOFTIRQ);
+}
+
static void __init restrict_unbound_cpumask(const char *name, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
if (!cpumask_intersects(wq_unbound_cpumask, mask)) {
@@ -7408,6 +7435,8 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void)
{
struct wq_pod_type *pt = &wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_SYSTEM];
int std_nice[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS] = { 0, HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL };
+ void (*irq_work_fns[2])(struct irq_work *) = { bh_pool_kick_normal,
+ bh_pool_kick_highpri };
int i, cpu;
BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct pool_workqueue) < __alignof__(long long));
@@ -7455,8 +7484,10 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void)
i = 0;
for_each_bh_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
- init_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu, std_nice[i++]);
+ init_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu, std_nice[i]);
pool->flags |= POOL_BH;
+ init_irq_work(bh_pool_irq_work(pool), irq_work_fns[i]);
+ i++;
}
i = 0;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 18:39 Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-02-14 19:03 ` [PATCH wq/for-6.9] workqueue: Fix queue_work_on() with BH workqueues Linus Torvalds
2024-02-14 19:16 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 1:23 ` [PATCH wq/for-6.9] workqueue, irq_work: Build fix for !CONFIG_IRQ_WORK Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 5:10 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 10:24 ` Anders Roxell
2024-02-16 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zc0IzeM6tAvm1NTl@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox