From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch (mail-4317.proton.ch [185.70.43.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C464C41A81; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708027979; cv=none; b=r7hmyBSLtn/d7rLGbV1x6Rf09kvLnz5mMWbDFX54mMcQouiJE9d3sbI4uR7un0+NFOoZhgjjao+dR9cTXZsgu2jtMJcAZLbQwltAQhkmtZTVoVwG65MZrQSW0jsQWPM+vT2DvmTIg2F0HbNqn7t90SIL3rSbrBW0Mq+g4yaYM4M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708027979; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LOfUt/+1WPS9cSbJx/uVyM81LWxCL1/3bgci8HbBfpY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tqy9HyTg9jEpIAqVOL3pZni5ex/3UX1+pnzsAvFppewP2cPhi5i4UALoa47GKpBXePVsVZFebJ6DWNkEflA8vxckG4dCmLydd07Uox44FG0yBXVLg5sszKHT+QdG1CQeWO9O95PUywRGlugZ/q7V+Qi7YSK8OTEZJ0SRi3IVVAo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bluemarch.art; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bluemarch.art; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bluemarch.art header.i=@bluemarch.art header.b=NdWqEBAj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bluemarch.art Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bluemarch.art Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bluemarch.art header.i=@bluemarch.art header.b="NdWqEBAj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluemarch.art; s=protonmail; t=1708027965; x=1708287165; bh=LOfUt/+1WPS9cSbJx/uVyM81LWxCL1/3bgci8HbBfpY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=NdWqEBAjFoBshdmijvSqJK47SXSyGszhUAfDpDVYDUpGMJOe67Znp2D6ko1yodczi Jal7fMjBY24uGUZm9Sr15t6PJA3bQ0UOKRfPmze+YyC4Qi+OKzk+GF/NCHw07rskUu 1soqBLgSJsPBkP0T23VvFNqCPXmKz3V7gkxP6P4oJRzkL0iqAEeTnc7c1xf7PjkRcF 53CM7zU7dlotWReRgg0OSxWWlrXCOQzlAWZo48FysjR5d7y61WkWC4gFo4J8tfdx2/ CLZRh4DBMcb+xCwS0r3QKl6LwlbZRNeualqNvRJzAtjcZBBBvaIrYPlglB+acz9g/j LXv5OTxLwWx8Q== Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:12:29 +0000 To: =?utf-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?= From: Szilard Fabian Cc: W_Armin@gmx.de, hdegoede@redhat.com, jwoithe@just42.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <43960922-d6bb-e5f6-2156-f1b35142244a@linux.intel.com> References: <20240129163502.161409-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240129175714.164326-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240207023031.56805-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <43960922-d6bb-e5f6-2156-f1b35142244a@linux.intel.com> Feedback-ID: 87830438:user:proton Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:34:00PM +0100, Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen wrote: > Why is this posted as RFC? It's my third patch into the Linux kernel (the first two being a i8042 quir= k table related patch) and I was not sure if everything is okay with v1/v2. But it looks like the patch matured enough in v3 to reach it's near final form and there was not too much to comment anymore. Sorry for any inconvenience I've caused with that. Thanks for your feedback. I'll post v4 in a moment. Regards, Szilard