From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cestmir Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>,
Alex Gladkov <agladkov@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Costa Shulyupin <cshulyup@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-wq v2 0/5] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:48:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcCu7GWMPWOFYAFY@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240203154334.791910-1-longman@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 03/02/24 10:43, Waiman Long wrote:
> v2:
> - [v1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240130183336.511948-1-longman@redhat.com/
> - Rebased on top of wq's for-v6.9 branch.
> - Use the new pwq_tryinc_nr_active() mechanism to freeze the new
> pwq of an ordered workqueue until the old pwq has been properly
> drained to maintain ordering.
> - Make rescuer follow changes in workqueue unbound cpumask as well
> as its sysfs cpumask, if available.
>
> Ordered workqueues does not currently follow changes made to the
> global unbound cpumask because per-pool workqueue changes may break
> the ordering guarantee. IOW, a work function in an ordered workqueue
> may run on a cpuset isolated CPU.
>
> This series enables ordered workqueues to follow changes made to
> the global unbound cpumask by temporaily freeze the newly allocated
> pool_workqueue by using the new frozen flag to freeze execution of
> newly queued work items until the old pwq has been properly flushed.
>
> The cpumask of the rescuer task of each workqueue is also made to follow
> changes in workqueue unbound cpumask as well as its sysfs cpumask,
> if available.
From a testing point of view this now looks good to me.
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Best,
Juri
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-03 15:43 [PATCH-wq v2 0/5] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues Waiman Long
2024-02-03 15:43 ` [PATCH-wq v2 1/5] workqueue: Skip __WQ_DESTROYING workqueues when updating global unbound cpumask Waiman Long
2024-02-05 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-03 15:43 ` [PATCH-wq v2 2/5] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues Waiman Long
2024-02-05 19:23 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-03 15:43 ` [PATCH-wq v2 3/5] workqueue: Thaw frozen pwq in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask() Waiman Long
2024-02-04 10:15 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-04 16:07 ` Waiman Long
2024-02-03 15:43 ` [PATCH-wq v2 4/5] kernel/workqueue: Let rescuers follow unbound wq cpumask changes Waiman Long
2024-02-03 15:43 ` [PATCH-wq v2 5/5] workqueue: Bind unbound workqueue rescuer to wq_unbound_cpumask Waiman Long
2024-02-05 9:48 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcCu7GWMPWOFYAFY@localhost.localdomain \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=agladkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ckalina@redhat.com \
--cc=cshulyup@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox