public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com,
	masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com, takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix change point of data handling
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:51:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcD17mTRnfIaueAW@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <237bd5c8-184d-4e46-ba66-253e3ef0c895@tuxon.dev>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]


> > According to my understanding, we should only mark this TAP good if it
> > is in the range 5-7. I need to double check with Renesas, though.
> 
> OK, my understanding is that it should be in the middle (beginning being
> the tap that triggered change point of the input data, end being the next
> tap with the same ID). This is what I understand from this: "As the width
> of the input data is 1 (UI), select TAP6 or TAP7 which is
> 
> *the median* of next TAP3 from TAP3."

Yes, I agree. With 0x0e, that means TAP1+2+3 are changing points and we
should be far away from them, like 5-7.

But: I am still waiting for Renesas to answer my questions regarding
SMPCMP. I'd like to get that first, so we have clear facts then.

> > Boot failure is one test. Read/write tests should be another, I think.
> 
> OK, I'll try also read/write. Do you have in mind something particular?

Nope. Just consistency checks.

> > Because if we select a bad TAP, bad things might happen later. To reduce
> > the amount of testing, read/write testing could only be triggered if the
> > new code path was excecuted?
> 
> I'm not sure how to trigger that (or maybe I haven't understood your
> statement...)

I thought something in the lines of:

- print out when you needed SMPCMP to select a TAP
- check the log for that printout
- if (printout) do read_write_tests

Dunno if that makes sense with your test setup.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-05 11:27 [PATCH v3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix change point of data handling Claudiu
2024-02-05 13:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-05 13:47   ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-05 14:51     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-02-06 13:35       ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-08  0:56         ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-08 16:38           ` claudiu beznea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZcD17mTRnfIaueAW@shikoro \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com \
    --cc=takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox