From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com,
masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com, takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix change point of data handling
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 14:07:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcDdn2AVz8FIXzak@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205112702.213050-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1323 bytes --]
Hi Claudiu,
thanks for the updated version!
> To comply with this, the patch checks if this mismatch is present and
> updates the priv->smpcmp mask only if it is not. Previous code checked if
> the value of SMPCMP register was zero. However, on RZ/G3S, this leads to
> failues as it may happen, e.g., the following:
> CMPNGU=0x0e, CMPNGD=0x0e, SMPCMP=0x000e000e.
Can you add the current TAP number (variable 'i') to this printout?
According to my understanding, we should only mark this TAP good if it
is in the range 5-7. I need to double check with Renesas, though.
> Along with it, as mmc_send_tuning() may return with error even before the
> MMC command reach the controller (and because at that point cmd_error = 0),
> the update of priv->smpcmp mask has been done only if the return value of
> mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_error) is 0 (success).
This is a needed change, for sure.
> This change has been checked on the devices with the following DTSes by
> doing 100 consecutive boots and checking for the tuning failure message:
Boot failure is one test. Read/write tests should be another, I think.
Because if we select a bad TAP, bad things might happen later. To reduce
the amount of testing, read/write testing could only be triggered if the
new code path was excecuted?
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 11:27 [PATCH v3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix change point of data handling Claudiu
2024-02-05 13:07 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-02-05 13:47 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-05 14:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-06 13:35 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-08 0:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-08 16:38 ` claudiu beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcDdn2AVz8FIXzak@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com \
--cc=takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox