From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm,page_owner: Display all stacks and their count
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:14:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcaxxQE1PkepEWwf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcaesCP4mY-94ciJ@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:52:48PM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Thinking about it some more, I think I made a mistake:
>
> I am walking all buckets, and within those buckets there are not only
> page_owner stack_records, which means that I could return a stack_record
> from e.g: KASAN (which I think can evict stack_records) and then
> everything goes off the rails.
> Which means I cannot walk the buckets like that.
>
> Actually, I think that having something like the following
>
> struct list_stack_records {
> struct stack_record *stack;
> struct list_stack_records *next;
> }
Or, I could use the extra_bits field from handle_parts to flag that
when a depot_stack_handle_t is used by page_owner.
Then __stack_depot_get_next_stack_record() would check whether
a stack_record->handle.extra_bits has the page_owner bit, and only
return those stacks that have such bit.
This would solve the problem of returning a potentially evictable stack
, only by returning page_owner's stack_records, and I would not have
to maintain my own list.
I yet have to see how that would look like, but sounds promising.
Do you think that is feasible Marco?
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 23:45 [PATCH v7 0/4] page_owner: print stacks and their outstanding allocations Oscar Salvador
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] lib/stackdepot: Move stack_record struct definition into the header Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 7:45 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 17:39 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-10 9:59 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] mm,page_owner: Implement the tracking of the stacks count Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 7:37 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 7:45 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 21:42 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:44 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-11 20:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] mm,page_owner: Display all stacks and their count Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 8:00 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 23:14 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-02-10 7:52 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-11 20:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-12 10:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 23:14 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] mm,page_owner: Filter out stacks by a threshold Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 0:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] page_owner: print stacks and their outstanding allocations Andrew Morton
2024-02-09 21:31 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 8:03 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:32 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcaxxQE1PkepEWwf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).