From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:32:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zcq4jj3vsVtqQIHr@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc352315-0b7b-407a-8704-e424934a922d@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:14:49PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/12/24 12:33, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > The test cases for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic were failing on a
> > variety of architectures that are big endian or do not support
> > misalgined accesses. Both of these test cases are changed to support big
> > and little endian architectures.
> >
> > The test for ip_fast_csum is changed to align the data along (14 +
> > NET_IP_ALIGN) bytes which is the alignment of an IP header. The test for
> > csum_ipv6_magic aligns the data using a struct. An extra padding field
> > is added to the struct to ensure that the size of the struct is the same
> > on all architectures (44 bytes).
> >
> > Fixes: 6f4c45cbcb00 ("kunit: Add tests for csum_ipv6_magic and ip_fast_csum")
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
>
> This thing really wants to annoy me. Now I get:
>
> # test_csum_ipv6_magic: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:494
> Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
> ( u64)csum_result == 46543 (0xb5cf)
> ( u64)expected == 46544 (0xb5d0)
> not ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
>
> with the parisc64 tests. All other architectures / platforms work fine
> after applying the various pending fixes. It looks like a carry gets
> lost somewhere, but I have not been able to figure out where exactly
> that happens. This only happens with the 64-bit hppa assembler code.
>
> Guenter
>
How do you test parisc64? It's not in buildroot which I have been using
to test the other architectures.
- Charlie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-12 20:33 [PATCH v7 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-12 20:33 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] lib: checksum: Fix type casting in checksum kunits Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-13 15:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-12 20:33 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests Charlie Jenkins
2024-02-13 0:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-13 0:32 ` Charlie Jenkins [this message]
2024-02-13 1:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-13 6:57 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests [issues with parisc64] Guenter Roeck
2024-02-13 15:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] lib: checksum: Use aligned accesses for ip_fast_csum and csum_ipv6_magic tests Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zcq4jj3vsVtqQIHr@ghost \
--to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox