From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1798A14A93; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707903152; cv=none; b=sdMBuY9OUiv2n555OUEoLTrZMyDmJhAm3r2CbuikOafkZPdPGFuIiwClf8UUbmBETpnXDNFbgLjTCnJNShwV3htbTia87qQm458lZ9F8FhYL3JZhs6MN9bkWN8RA782bX84ePKCwz5gA2i4Okw+mSvoTj2+SxjoXz0Bu2GdbZuo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707903152; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sgHsCHxDoO5MTtQjA5HZm+TAMiYkv40VOYSxH54M9zo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tGsy30tp2JyrByWb1KjZbDPW5VgJ0QN35ge/IX2WllcmItoFCfOfJGVMkmySEV70RndalWiP8rhoqownFGVa8u35vBkAaOIDnoeqa5JUjbBj77znlg4vJNWqidmMTbZcNpZQuEU8iNkKpUYon8PwD6mQf9AA6aYSoLJpoIe2Ous= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nU6797v1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nU6797v1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707903150; x=1739439150; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=sgHsCHxDoO5MTtQjA5HZm+TAMiYkv40VOYSxH54M9zo=; b=nU6797v17Rn6J/S4CVT0fMXk0cVMUCBHqbnM1OBU9KDlrEjcoKWfVHF8 UH1S1Ijxb/+iLC+LtjeSbRHGdpVP4IOn5q6irVIC2SRgQwOcVg/wnatZF waOlaz7CiEeMSHplGuEndRCx76mTi8KEEsipwgQ1/O7Dz/IcbJDesoKcE vA0kVfM2TKOxtV4ZYQPrdt86fwYO765yu819pjeWQnau7eR3R2n+SuBn4 zxAEFVkdRf44FbtHsUCScO8JbnUKP9xM/1CppEkDX6AyIj8nwVbIOT948 6f9rUAsH4LsM7JbkjhRfY1l52xjznzQ+boZboIj8YVK1b3XH2urkXzRa4 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10982"; a="2303707" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,159,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2303707" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2024 01:32:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10982"; a="935606727" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,159,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="935606727" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2024 01:32:27 -0800 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:32:24 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pwm: lpss: drop redundant runtime PM handles Message-ID: References: <20240212061037.4271-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20240212061037.4271-3-raag.jadav@intel.com> <91bbea2c-b6f7-48cf-b540-83c73750d1d2@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91bbea2c-b6f7-48cf-b540-83c73750d1d2@linux.intel.com> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 2/12/24 08:10, Raag Jadav wrote: > > We no longer need empty runtime PM handles for PCI devices after commit > > c5eb1190074c ("PCI / PM: Allow runtime PM without callback functions"). > > Drop them and let PCI core take care of power state transitions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > > --- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-pci.c | 22 ---------------------- > > 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) > > > Will this patch cause a regression if applied without your another patch to > the drivers/pci/pci-driver.c? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240212063233.5599-1-raag.jadav@intel.com/ Yes, I'll send out a v2 with updated commit message after the PCI one is accepted. Raag