From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D411272C4 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707933023; cv=none; b=YxmrzBggc1fePfGWUw/G7kbymXEetyxoVQtloeqRLbvgL6YMDRdz7hGrw+1gLWABZyLRTyhOsjlN6v2ysHkw0mWfe3HZy0wOE4njgcypvNaVZV8WHLx7+/FJ6/OeON8NMsTMgsT6CDnCY2k3NLv4Q7gOoXTeNEMxyBWg5PV8POM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707933023; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pwZc27YRL5gt3u/z/Ayw6UyQwtWSrydt57fbBJbZ6BA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iv1rb+J5ptxzi5IK0tGzyzMKcaGqc3T0Ro/jFZNxW6JECp4X7sacD/yy1L1NHEh49am+pRC0m4vz7cnJ0rQDTeqKgg1n8lGj32LmPjbOpU2dE2M2CI2uNUK1SdG/i5ZsVSOqZ+XvA1Er+Zt4EMsCVlY317C0KAEj7MSnYGQkUgo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Te0DoadY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Te0DoadY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707933022; x=1739469022; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=pwZc27YRL5gt3u/z/Ayw6UyQwtWSrydt57fbBJbZ6BA=; b=Te0DoadY1hbm9Ey35aC3l99AaxPUZoJ3VhaEHLoJXl4iBxfFv81uo59O aT+BlqH2BjZZd6M8ygYLQmb2TBByfJ7NrEkJACFzR/2PVALPp2SNPKtuh /kjE/w02rkRpXJMaz4U6/64o90M/hQHw2Fs2igoDfoGwKviGpi5kKo3n1 cGcM4BNCmjkXk7vxoJeeEkPrwnVDTb3TrN5dJ1k3lYFMOCiAdmNyxJWVc 4YvRgv24pv1anMnOe8Z16+Dr08W5k78AXBBeFWhnz94+HlVp6NW4Fa4Yq 1juU5s3qCXoQaQ7yjWGWTtKYgA5QS4ZyZJMKezc3DEx9hkkBSMOfkvoAA w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10984"; a="13381040" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,160,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13381040" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2024 09:50:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10984"; a="912092700" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,160,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="912092700" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2024 09:50:18 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1raJOi-00000004Yi2-2F58; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:50:16 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:50:16 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Thomas Zimmermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] auxdisplay: Move cfag12864b.h to the subsystem folder Message-ID: References: <20240212132515.2660837-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240212132515.2660837-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:42:56PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:40 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > I don't want to rebase, esp. taking into account the proposal below. > > Why do you not want to rebase? It's a standard practice in the Linux kernel development. If it's not a so critical issue, why should we rebase? rebasing will break SHA sums and it's not appreciated especially at the late rcX weeks. Linus can even refuse to accept a PR based on this fact. > The proposal is orthogonal in any case. True. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko