From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix to don't call f2fs_stop_checkpoint in spinlock coverage
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:50:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zd4g2SgQn3v_ZJMj@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222121851.883141-2-chao@kernel.org>
On 02/22, Chao Yu wrote:
> f2fs_stop_checkpoint(, false) is complex and it may sleep, so we should
> move it outside segmap_lock spinlock coverage in get_new_segment().
Chao, I merged this patch into
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev-test&id=f3b576d209983b5d6e1cb130bfc8ca1f0bbcad6d
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index d0209ea77dd2..8edc42071e6f 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2646,6 +2646,7 @@ static void get_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> unsigned int old_zoneno = GET_ZONE_FROM_SEG(sbi, *newseg);
> bool init = true;
> int i;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> spin_lock(&free_i->segmap_lock);
>
> @@ -2671,9 +2672,8 @@ static void get_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> secno = find_first_zero_bit(free_i->free_secmap,
> MAIN_SECS(sbi));
> if (secno >= MAIN_SECS(sbi)) {
> - f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false,
> - STOP_CP_REASON_NO_SEGMENT);
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
> }
> segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno);
> @@ -2704,7 +2704,13 @@ static void get_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, test_bit(segno, free_i->free_segmap));
> __set_inuse(sbi, segno);
> *newseg = segno;
> +out_unlock:
> spin_unlock(&free_i->segmap_lock);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false, STOP_CP_REASON_NO_SEGMENT);
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> + }
> }
>
> static void reset_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, int modified)
> --
> 2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 12:18 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: delete f2fs_get_new_segment() declaration Chao Yu
2024-02-22 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix to don't call f2fs_stop_checkpoint in spinlock coverage Chao Yu
2024-02-27 17:50 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2024-02-28 1:23 ` Chao Yu
2024-02-22 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: fix to handle segment allocation failure correctly Chao Yu
2024-02-26 7:46 ` Chao Yu
2024-02-26 10:28 ` Zhiguo Niu
2024-02-22 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: introduce FAULT_NO_SEGMENT Chao Yu
2024-02-28 22:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: delete f2fs_get_new_segment() declaration patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zd4g2SgQn3v_ZJMj@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox