From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7B983CD8 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708549664; cv=none; b=HXjtDpMX6VM9MeZ50LG2uO4ChYGvv63aDOScTXm6OwySUnMoEs5ogik+qWQbkNSyjm39zY7dwyo7qBS+JoxEHWzSLKHhg29dsJnx6FhIvPylYW/C2wXyvTOCCO4pmkPDJJyrUvvf8j/7NaLZ8LsWS/ZCSnpJUfvGYQbswgI9qjE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708549664; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nA1youg90/ZP2DIb11j9lh81YY3aAWIu00fTWWD2H/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cVfSidIoxQvLOixjpmyvBUj5QTTFewSdizqEveZR3KBKMw/7+mOeAr4bTwsdrmuYAFvpJniEwwcTSLH6hLXiMcsVRJNWbnbWqZlojHEO3VkOrL3mSfuDGx80zYwiZ4VWKJkCvzVEAoKXTx90Trz3b362XOcfEKGQwv257Ep6qk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dk8Mxis/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dk8Mxis/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708549663; x=1740085663; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=nA1youg90/ZP2DIb11j9lh81YY3aAWIu00fTWWD2H/U=; b=dk8Mxis/i3cG6raRd/dzrrVPbTBo+BUHKv6U8F6eKMnvPOYwJ8Qs6Swl 1HFwdTNbysGmvMU/8CiGDc7J+vK0xbBNRG8iUNBVCErTCkeggfwTenlq7 xaibkoRHfO4VpYudt2UE6IBSygFuVfrZrnnHLS0b21h3mi8X9NTjya0gt ETZ3zOFGrjNbm2MAED1xS3yeyIZ8uoB/UXyTA0odlYV/sDailBOU7W1nU CBEYOKfSmf2bKgQgsRLMkCFMSpz0GKRpbymwoWotRyD64W4el9dSs8+Su JtrFJFPzhOLZoP0MiWsSEsCMVPDlAE0BZE0iyrcemnbEOJafyVb7dFQcb g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10991"; a="13297218" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,176,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13297218" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2024 13:07:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10991"; a="913373115" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,176,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913373115" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2024 13:07:40 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rctoX-00000006TCs-16Ap; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 23:07:37 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 23:07:36 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Lucas De Marchi , Yury Norov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks Message-ID: References: <20240208074521.577076-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> <20240208074521.577076-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:06:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 22:30, Dmitry Baryshkov > > wrote: ... > > Excuse me, it seems a c&p from gitlab didn't work as expected. > > No problem, it's clear that the patch has not been properly tested and > obviously wrong. Has to be dropped. If somebody wants that, it will > be material for v6.10 cycle. ...which makes me think that bitmap(bitops) lack of assembly test case(s). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko