From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] rcu-tasks: Maintain real-time response in rcu_tasks_postscan()
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:14:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zdi2aXbgKdsmP/1O@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZdiMympnNOo6e+5T@lothringen>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 01:17:14PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index 866743e0796f..0ff2b554f5b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -973,12 +973,13 @@ static void rcu_tasks_postscan(struct list_head *hop)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> unsigned long j = jiffies + 1;
> struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_tasks.rtpcpu, cpu);
> - struct task_struct *t;
> - struct task_struct *t1;
> - struct list_head tmp;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rtpcp);
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(t, t1, &rtpcp->rtp_exit_list, rcu_tasks_exit_list) {
> + while (!list_empty(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list)) {
> + struct task_struct *t;
> + t = list_first_entry(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list, typeof(*t), rcu_tasks_exit_list);
> + list_del_init(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list);
Oh no! The task has to stay in the list for subsequent grace periods! Please
forget that suggestion... Yours looks good!
Thanks.
> +
> if (list_empty(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list))
> rcu_tasks_pertask(t, hop);
>
> @@ -987,14 +988,9 @@ static void rcu_tasks_postscan(struct list_head *hop)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && time_before(jiffies, j))
> continue;
>
> - // Keep our place in the list while pausing.
> - // Nothing else traverses this list, so adding a
> - // bare list_head is OK.
> - list_add(&tmp, &t->rcu_tasks_exit_list);
> raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rtpcp);
> cond_resched(); // For CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernels
> raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rtpcp);
> - list_del(&tmp);
> j = jiffies + 1;
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rtpcp);
> @@ -1219,7 +1215,6 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void)
> struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp;
> struct task_struct *t = current;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list));
> rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_tasks.rtpcpu, t->rcu_tasks_exit_cpu);
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
> list_del_init(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-17 1:27 [PATCH v2 0/6] RCU tasks fixes for v6.9 Boqun Feng
2024-02-17 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rcu-tasks: Repair RCU Tasks Trace quiescence check Boqun Feng
2024-02-17 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rcu-tasks: Add data to eliminate RCU-tasks/do_exit() deadlocks Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 20:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-17 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] rcu-tasks: Initialize " Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 20:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-23 11:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-17 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] rcu-tasks: Maintain lists " Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-23 12:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-24 0:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-17 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] rcu-tasks: Eliminate deadlocks involving do_exit() and RCU tasks Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-17 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] rcu-tasks: Maintain real-time response in rcu_tasks_postscan() Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 17:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 20:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-22 22:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-23 12:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-23 15:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-02-24 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-22 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] RCU tasks fixes for v6.9 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 22:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-23 12:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-24 0:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-26 13:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-26 14:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zdi2aXbgKdsmP/1O@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox