From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E67491420DF; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708958240; cv=none; b=aesMy1QjzRTFW1pD025NyKrunwINcxv4XKOjljFO/4ZjJmo7WbFy/qAiGgE/jpYVgI5qIqIdADaRua7tU6UtBFbJcndgN11iWue0lZ9Cu1x801Dvf0TrxQboy4AyaxhKZn94HJec+k8FZrXt8hXW9kcP82Wa0IdHKcH32pnns80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708958240; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ASCStbbadCwY+pa29PI3g+LnHSlVBBJ8vQnqpkE72ek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k2QLn+hb5qVc2yeaxoWD4imMprYdXjN0h1rp5RmS8n6FsJBPYI+KhhrZdMk2BaHia4lma6zurUAwlDepSimoxcQZ1QQ/WjgqLKazVp3ZyamtjzgSC0IafAsYMWxq7aAEWYr5bkwgFMGRAtZ29dQGXJtX+tTmP9eRl8lWPNTAm3Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=d6rrwwPH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="d6rrwwPH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708958239; x=1740494239; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ASCStbbadCwY+pa29PI3g+LnHSlVBBJ8vQnqpkE72ek=; b=d6rrwwPHuqLetuP0Cu7WrLeAP+Psw6X2HTuXUBVOy3InMSUYvPP2ppv/ 8Eo5TAlrg9bi4ilegrx17SgX1IoiPa5GrfeExTmQouhwD234RVTig+VgL A96WmMoDtfm+XM1kevn2eXsmjUBR96hVbpUCXk6GFGnvU2kxzIbkxsYBG 9IQTh2Q0wdrgZxM0KVtGcgvFOG3LGdm88w9PsthlGKZdn3HGYE+1aUc6q j/INP22U16CS6k4WWo2ltYSSmXxS5wTNSSA1JkMiidCTNNu+ZITCqxHbT 2NovjvwxfB19i1BxEolcUdi1ul9Kt90eLFzytE1AcFVwGcWAAyokAkctc A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10995"; a="14680281" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,185,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="14680281" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 06:37:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10995"; a="913873542" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,185,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913873542" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 06:37:16 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rec6T-00000007hmJ-1Rj4; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:37:13 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:37:13 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Mike Looijmans , Dan Carpenter , Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: ti-ads1298: Fix error code in probe() Message-ID: References: <5f393a87-ca8b-4e68-a6f4-a79f75a91ccb@moroto.mountain> <20240224181354.76842da7@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240224181354.76842da7@jic23-huawei> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 06:13:54PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:10:25 +0100 > Mike Looijmans wrote: > > > Good catch on both patches. > > > > If so desired, you have my > > > > Acked-by: Mike Looijmans > > Dan, here is a classic example of why I think any series with more than > 1 patch could benefit from a cover letter. It gives somewhere for > reviewers to give tags for the lot in a fashion b4 can understand. > > Otherwise great find and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git > with Mike's tag added to both of them! Hopefully the fixes tags will > remain stable - whilst in theory that tree doesn't get rebased, in practice > it might if I messed anything up enough :( I even added this to be automatically done when I use my script [1]. Dunno if b4 relay (or what is there to send patch series?) can handle that. [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko