From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A87912C55E; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708967106; cv=none; b=rWofvR3vCtn64VyRba/A3o7UiNiZgFQZHJpsZUS8nGeXgyxoC1uwgfad2SEP4+pyns/EzHQPOWYtvZhV7a/xxajXNS9hs1EBVjzo++fmf8gUw7LsxM5uYPQKvn4tw0ZcNC+L8A53g7cwSfoiE6FoyfmxCffHrsiFoLZ3/SbLB6o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708967106; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MRsBgIxlb/4Wq6P8y8ODlq2nplU2xHNAakSQBx9Hqe8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uKcxylM0baurjMTspuJgLs8rLUsnndXcxDqgFlBgvco8j5dSd5A+/au5VtGVby5OcsaBKnnDKh3HEj/huOxkao0xINjYLfvEaERwcqhVJg7OS1YQplfk1xqbWLyjTOTGYC2sG3v/l0hDpfLzdOTTEQYYuwC6eB6MLSa0bvVX9ww= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=LKdY0dNo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LKdY0dNo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708967106; x=1740503106; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=MRsBgIxlb/4Wq6P8y8ODlq2nplU2xHNAakSQBx9Hqe8=; b=LKdY0dNo8EuSYIzbvJLkRlnZqXGkRLZ3Dl4j9E2hsG/MxJytbTBg3dDT m5R3Wnq3dIyEDgvi5wGRoPV6Z+3tXtapKt3POC/zPPOGJwcVh//gfNYA+ x27NCGZpVa3JJXafjlZq+YRpoWNnGcQTx/TpS/Hk0IE4A9OeW3jotdQWU /p7oov2nWbSL+3VrdV9Y+m2WTs/MHU9SQHgUP7UjZXDJDu3S3CaaoXTVz 5wNn+6Vp0r7juVh3pXLj/B+C48QHJ0qJWuJB2exnejijq/0wZ+7Me5C5k /Dny1RYE1mFB7QBCdQ+BxvasE+gNOGE372ItLRcYyV11Wq2JNxKC5cwlF A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10996"; a="13905916" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,186,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13905916" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 09:05:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10996"; a="913882130" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,186,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913882130" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2024 09:05:00 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1reePR-00000007k7J-2SR5; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:04:57 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:04:57 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robin van der Gracht , Paul Burton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] auxdisplay: Add driver for MAX695x 7-segment LED controllers Message-ID: References: <20240219170337.2161754-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240219170337.2161754-10-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:01:46PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:03 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > Add initial driver for the MAX6958 and MAX6959 7-segment LED > > controllers. ... > LGTM, so > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven As per discussion, let consider maximum digits as a next feature coming later on. I'll take this tag, tell me if I shouldn't. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko