public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, bvanassche@acm.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, mpatocka@redhat.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: remove blk_mq_in_flight() and blk_mq_in_flight_rw()
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:05:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zf79w4Ip3fzSMCWh@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240323035959.1397382-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>

On Fri, Mar 22 2024 at 11:59P -0400,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:

> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> Now that blk-mq also use per_cpu counter to trace inflight as bio-based
> device, they can be replaced by part_in_flight() and part_in_flight_rw()
> directly.

Please reference the commit that enabled this, e.g.:

With commit XXXXX ("commit subject") blk-mq was updated to use per_cpu
counters to track inflight IO same as bio-based devices, so replace
blk_mq_in_flight* with part_in_flight() and part_in_flight_rw()
accordingly.

(I'm not seeing the commit in question, but I only took a quick look).

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-23 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-23  3:59 [PATCH 0/2] block: support to account io_ticks precisely Yu Kuai
2024-03-23  3:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Yu Kuai
2024-03-23  3:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: remove blk_mq_in_flight() and blk_mq_in_flight_rw() Yu Kuai
2024-03-23 16:05   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2024-03-24  2:11     ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-24 21:57       ` Mike Snitzer
2024-03-25  1:15         ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-23  3:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] block: support to account io_ticks precisely Yu Kuai
2024-03-23  4:08   ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-23  3:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Yu Kuai
2024-03-23  3:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: remove blk_mq_in_flight() and blk_mq_in_flight_rw() Yu Kuai
2024-04-06  7:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] block: support to account io_ticks precisely Yu Kuai
2024-04-20  1:49   ` Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zf79w4Ip3fzSMCWh@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox