From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Jose Fernandez <josef@netflix.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add selftest for bpf_task_get_cgroup
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:58:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfgQXlU_wKpXScwh@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240316162241.628855-2-josef@netflix.com>
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 10:22:41AM -0600, Jose Fernandez wrote:
SNIP
> +void test_task_get_cgroup(void)
> +{
> + struct test_task_get_cgroup *skel;
> + int err, fd;
> + pid_t pid;
> + __u64 cgroup_id, expected_cgroup_id;
> + const struct timespec req = {
> + .tv_sec = 1,
> + .tv_nsec = 0,
> + };
> +
> + fd = test__join_cgroup(TEST_CGROUP);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(fd < 0, "test_join_cgroup_TEST_CGROUP"))
> + return;
> +
> + skel = test_task_get_cgroup__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_task_get_cgroup__open"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + err = test_task_get_cgroup__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_task_get_cgroup__load"))
> + goto cleanup;
nit, you could call test_task_get_cgroup__open_and_load
> +
> + err = test_task_get_cgroup__attach(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_task_get_cgroup__attach"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + pid = getpid();
> + expected_cgroup_id = get_cgroup_id(TEST_CGROUP);
> + if (!ASSERT_GT(expected_cgroup_id, 0, "get_cgroup_id"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* Trigger nanosleep to enter the sched_switch tracepoint */
> + /* The previous task should be this process */
> + syscall(__NR_nanosleep, &req, NULL);
would smaller sleep do? also we have our own usleep (in test_progs.c)
that calls nanosleep
> +
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.pid_to_cgid_map), &pid,
> + &cgroup_id);
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(cgroup_id, expected_cgroup_id, "cgroup_id");
> +
> +cleanup:
> + test_task_get_cgroup__destroy(skel);
> + close(fd);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_get_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_get_cgroup.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..580f8f0657d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_get_cgroup.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright 2024 Netflix, Inc.
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +struct cgroup *bpf_task_get_cgroup(struct task_struct *task) __ksym;
> +void bpf_cgroup_release(struct cgroup *cgrp) __ksym;
> +
> +struct {
> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> + __uint(max_entries, 4096);
> + __type(key, __u32);
> + __type(value, __u64);
> +} pid_to_cgid_map SEC(".maps");
> +
> +SEC("tp_btf/sched_switch")
> +int BPF_PROG(sched_switch, bool preempt, struct task_struct *prev,
> + struct task_struct *next)
> +{
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + u64 cgroup_id;
> + u32 pid;
> +
could you filter for your pid in here like we do in other places,
(eg in progs/kprobe_multi.c)
in which case you won't need hash map, but just a single value
to store the cgroup id to
jirka
> + cgrp = bpf_task_get_cgroup(prev);
> + if (cgrp == NULL)
> + return 0;
> + cgroup_id = cgrp->kn->id;
> + pid = prev->pid;
> + bpf_map_update_elem(&pid_to_cgid_map, &pid, &cgroup_id, BPF_ANY);
> +
> + bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.40.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-16 16:22 [PATCH V2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add bpf_task_get_cgroup kfunc Jose Fernandez
2024-03-16 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add selftest for bpf_task_get_cgroup Jose Fernandez
2024-03-18 3:10 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2024-03-18 3:15 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-18 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-03-19 0:30 ` Jose Fernandez
2024-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH V2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add bpf_task_get_cgroup kfunc Yonghong Song
2024-03-18 16:07 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfgQXlU_wKpXScwh@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@netflix.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.pizza \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox