Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] nfc: st95hf: Switch to using gpiod API

Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-20T11:20:15Z

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:12:58AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:25:34AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:39:23PM CET, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > >This updates the driver to gpiod API, and removes yet another use of
> > > >of_get_named_gpio().
> > > >
> > > net-next is closed, send again next week.
> >
> > Same Q: Why to resend? Can't you utilise lore.kernel.org?
>
> Because that is how Netdev development currently operates.
> A system which I believe emerged as a way to handle the
> enormous volume of patches involved. Maybe it could change,
> but that is a different conversation.
>
> Other subsystems work differently, and that is fine too.
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#git-trees-and-patch-flow

I see that this is the limitation of patchwork and/or nobody wants to "reopen"
the patch based on Message-ID. Still I believe it's possible to make it smarter.

In any case, I'll resend the patch(es) and try to keep in mind, that during
merge window net is a black hole (astronomically speaking).

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko